The Forum > Article Comments > The semantics of abortion > Comments
The semantics of abortion : Comments
By Helen Ransom, published 9/2/2006When does human life begin? A discussion on RU486, abortion and choice.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- ...
- 80
- 81
- 82
-
- All
The Hon Dana Sue Vale uttered the words that many Australians know to be a true fact by the latest census on population and religious denominations.
Whilst the Islamic community grew by 40% in the last 5 years, the Christian denominations grew by 5.5%.
Projected population statistics now suggest that by the year 2050 the Muslim community will be the majority.
Dana attempt to derail the abortion debate by this surprise announcement, in favour of returning control of its distribution to the government did not look at the other side of the coin.
The majority of Muslim women are not able to access the abortion procedures for fear of family retribution.
This would give them the freedom also to choose what they wanted to do with their bodies and lives. Many do not have a choice even in ill health.
However, looking at ourselves as a Nation, we have available enough contraception to depopulate the world.
We as a Nation are not emphasising the need for our younger women to be supported in nurturing and the birth of future generations.
Instead we are expecting our women to have the one or two at the end of her reproductive life cycle with a strong emphasis on IVF procedures.
It is a known fact that our Industrial world is playing a major factor in disease of the reproductive organs of both the male and female.
The lowering a virility of testosterone have been scientifically stated in decline.
We cannot expect our leaders who have every intention of leading our Nation toward globalisation and economical rationalisation, to consider this in their square boxes.
Nor the masters we cannot see.