The Forum > Article Comments > Latham's war > Comments
Latham's war : Comments
By Scott Stephens, published 2/2/2006Scott Stephens examines the demise of Mark Latham and why Australians are so eager to forget him.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
I particularly liked his style of bringing family into politics unlike the Liberals who only really considers big business.
But the most awful thing about Latham not becoming Prime Minister is that the lies and deceit of the current Government continue unabated.
I am appalled that Liberal friends of mine see "nothing wrong" with the methods of conducting business of Government without honour or integrity. For ten years our Country has prostituted its reputation across the world, from the children overboard scandal to the current wheat board fiasco, not forgetting the Veteran Affairs coverup. And then there is the Weapons of Mass Destruction that just had to be destroyed by the "Willing".
And people in general don't appear to hold issue with the ongoing slaughter of our reputation. What is happening to the standards of good conduct?
Mark Latham and I did have one thing in common until he became Opposition Leader, then he changed his mind on that for political expediency. He believed in the concept of Voluntary Euthanasia.
I wondered if that attitude too has reverted, and changed in the past year or so. I hated the way he was treated when he was ill by both the media and even more so, the Machinery of the Labor Party of which I was ashamed to admit to being a Member of.
I also agree with a previous writer who told us exactly what he would have done with the offending camera. If anyone could have done it, Mark could!.....The sort of man I could quite comfortably be marooned on an isle with. A man of strength and character, lost to politics but not to a life worth living.
Mary Walsh
www.yourchoiceindying.com