The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The paternal state - politician sperm donors? No thanks! > Comments

The paternal state - politician sperm donors? No thanks! : Comments

By Melinda Tankard Reist, published 24/1/2005

Melinda Tankard Reist examines Gab Kovac's plan to get politicians to donate sperm.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. All
Hi Audrey,

I have changed my name again. I might even change it to Timist Reist so that I can infer that men are “wakers”, or maybe “P____s Persons” as I have seen written by a feminist lesbian who wanted IVF.

It is very noticeable that feminists rarely object to male vilification, but instead carry out an enormous amount of it themselves. I have also noticed no objection by any female to the maligning of males carried out by the author of the article. In fact, if you cross out any sentences that contain derogatory remarks made about males, then her article reduces down to almost nothing, and I have read an enormous amount of literature written by many feminists and other women that is very similar.

In the article, the author points out a problem, mocks and maligns males and that is about all. You have pointed out a problem regards adoption, but no possible solutions were given. Who do you think will provide solutions to the problems surrounding adoption?

In a humane society, IVF should be well down the list of options for couples that want children, because there are so many children who need a mother and a father. But it isn’t.

So what do you or other women believe are possible solutions to the problems (and please leave out the name calling and insinuations regards myself).
Posted by Timkins, Saturday, 29 January 2005 3:17:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Timmy
Melinda Tankard wrote a piece of satire. Get over it. Judging from your constant carping about women in all your posts throughout this forum I doubt very much you have even met a woman let alone fathered one. Get out a bit more, talk to women - you will find that some are really nice, decent human beings and some aren't - just like men
Posted by Ringtail, Saturday, 29 January 2005 3:31:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Ringtail,

So what do you or other women believe are possible solutions to the problems (and please leave out the name calling and insinuations regards myself).
Posted by Timkins, Saturday, 29 January 2005 3:35:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Timmy, darling, a good start would be for you to stop blaming women for all the world's problems.
Posted by Ringtail, Saturday, 29 January 2005 3:47:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nothing.

No woman so far has anything to offer except name calling and insinuations regards myself. You are simply following rule number 17 on the list of techniques generally used by feminists.

“17. Oppose any stereotyping or vilification of the female gender, then attempt to stereotype and vilify the male gender as much as possible. If a male questions this hypocrisy, then state that any stereotyping or vilification was only a joke, and feminism is actually altruistic, and plays an important part in the democratic process.”

Mock and malign males, and then say that it was all a joke. A well worn and used technique. If the article was “satire” then it should have been put in the “humour” category.

It is also noticed that rule 8 is commonly used.

“Blame males for as many problems as possible, as this transfers responsibility for those problems onto males, and hides the fact that females may be partly or fully responsible for those problems occurring. Transferring responsibility also relieves females from having to find workable solutions to those problems.”

So now you have the opportunity of “not” using rule 8 or rule 17

So what do you or other women believe are possible solutions to the problems (and please leave out the name calling and insinuations regards myself)?
Posted by Timkins, Saturday, 29 January 2005 3:54:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thanks for telling me about rules 8 and 17. How many rules are there and what are they? This is absolutely fascinating. I had no idea that these rules even existed. I guess you do a lot of reading. Me I get out and do volunteer work, local aged care home, animal rescue and environmental work - I'm too old to adopt so this is my way of assisting the world's problems. PS Even if I could have children I wouldn't want a politician's (of either sex). LOL
Posted by Ringtail, Saturday, 29 January 2005 4:15:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy