The Forum > Article Comments > Disinviting Jordan Peterson: the Faculty of Divinity, Cambridge and approved ideas > Comments
Disinviting Jordan Peterson: the Faculty of Divinity, Cambridge and approved ideas : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 25/3/2019It should be very clear that meaningless terms such as diversity and inclusiveness do very little to the content of actual intellectual conversation.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
I watched the whole Newman/Peterson interview.
Several times in fact. I thought it was a poor
interview. A missed opportunity. Which was a
shame because it meant that people did not get
to hear what Peterson says in his book.
In the pay-gap segment Newman tried to join
the dots rather than getting to the heart of
the issue such as the chicken/egg nature of female
dominated jobs being paid less. It was frustrating
to see his "hierarchy is biological" argument go
unchallenged as there is clear evidence that
egalitarianism is a evolutionary adaption that
benefited us in sustenance societies.
His blindness to existing gender roles which
decry equality of outcomes as only possible through
ïmmense social pressure amd tyranny"- an easy avenue
for exploration and criticism - was completely
missed in pursuit of a trap to crudely demonise
Peterson.
Still - to be a citizen is to engage and the Newman -
Peterson interview is a model of that engagement.
To quote the great African American scholar -
Henry Louis Gates:
Let them talk.
I don't like people who reduce human inter-action to tedious
name-calling.