The Forum > Article Comments > Transgenderism: the new feminist battleground > Comments
Transgenderism: the new feminist battleground : Comments
By Russell Grenning, published 29/6/2018Back in January, the City of London which manages Hampstead Heath and its ponds decided that the ladies' pond would welcome trans women and that this decision was consistent with the Equalities Act 2010.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
Posted by CHERFUL, Saturday, 30 June 2018 9:33:50 PM
| |
Actually, I would be ok with Lesbians using female toilets because they have used women’s toilets for years and it is obvious they are women, not men, so male sexual predators wouldn’t be able to claim femaleness like someone claiming to be transgender could and that’s where the real problem is.
Posted by CHERFUL, Saturday, 30 June 2018 9:51:27 PM
| |
You do realise Cherful that you could get yourself into trouble by referring to males identifying as females as males. They are starting to win more races. Unfortunately for females identifying as males its not the same. I know its confusing!
Posted by runner, Saturday, 30 June 2018 10:31:09 PM
| |
"Uni sex toilets, that’s it. Anything else is unworkable."
The thing that's actually unworkable is this concept that there's more than 2 genders, or that you can change your gender if you don't like what you were born with. What we are doing is embracing total ridiculousness, so that a certain group don't have to feel different when they are. Personally I prescribe to J S Mill's "Harm principle", and as long as it didn't affect others in an bad way I couldn't care less how they choose to live. But recently these people as a combined unit have gone too far, as with many others. http://youtu.be/RaRjIcwqoc0 What sort of a world do we want? A world of ethics where some things are taboo? Or a world of no ethics where there are no lines that cannot be crossed and unethical behaviour and depravity is encouraged? Take note that if there's no ethics and no boundaries, then this world will be divided between those who exploit, and those who are exploited. Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 1 July 2018 3:29:47 AM
| |
will be divided between those who exploit, and those who are exploited.
Armchair Critic, Correction, is not will be ! Posted by individual, Sunday, 1 July 2018 7:43:53 AM
| |
and as long as it didn't affect others in an bad way I couldn't care less how they choose to live.
Armchair Critic, That has been my motto all along but this isn't acceptable to the academic hangers-on control freak brigade. To them, pulling one's weight is most unacceptable. Anything resembling responsibility & respect & consideration for others is simply just an abhorrent thought. Why, even wildlife has a strong instinct of discipline which the indoctrinated half-baked intellectuals will never comprehend & the even more insipid milling within bureaucracy keep supporting these broken cogs of society by handing them our tax dollars willy nilly. Posted by individual, Sunday, 1 July 2018 8:40:29 AM
|
How can anyone tell if the person claiming to be a transgender, is not in reality
a sick male deviate. This just grants such deviates and sexual predators unquestioned admittance to shopping centre female toilets
and female facilities. I think most mothers of young daughters aren’t going to accept this at all.
I would certainly complain if I saw a person looking even a little bit too much like a male in a female toilet if I happened to encounter one.
And I have nothing against transsexuals, homosexuals, lesbians, but I think they should have a unisex toilet of their own, where they won’t scare the hell out of women who think there’s a man in the toilet with them.
It’s got nothing to do with discrimination, it’s got to do with the practicality of making this work when there will be men who will certainly use
this as a free pass to,enter women’s facilities with less than good intentions.
Uni sex toilets, that’s it. Anything else is unworkable