The Forum > Article Comments > Transgenderism: the new feminist battleground > Comments
Transgenderism: the new feminist battleground : Comments
By Russell Grenning, published 29/6/2018Back in January, the City of London which manages Hampstead Heath and its ponds decided that the ladies' pond would welcome trans women and that this decision was consistent with the Equalities Act 2010.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
-
- All
Posted by ALTRAV, Monday, 2 July 2018 7:14:59 PM
| |
What's the point of identifying with genetic differences, why make a big deal of it? wouldn't it be great to be liberated from all this tyranny of sex and gender?
For those who cannot overcome the need to divide and segregate pools and toilets, why do it by gender? http://jokes.wwpa.com/image.axd?picture=/2015/Klo.jpg Posted by Yuyutsu, Monday, 2 July 2018 10:17:39 PM
| |
Hi Yuyutsu,
Gosh, I didn't know that pools were segregated. I should get out more. As for integrating toilets, let's have a plebiscite on the issue and see what the people think :) Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 3 July 2018 8:56:18 AM
| |
Gawd, this is worse than the AGW argument.
As several have said the DNA you have is it. Accept it or get psychological treatment. If you think you are a girl maybe you have a low testosterone level. If so there is treatment available so then get it. All the legal carryon is a wash off of the lefty gay marriage campaign which is all designed to disrupt society. The left is trying to insist on strange pronoun words. In Canada it is illegal not to use them. You can be prosecuted for not using them ! Can you believe that ? I am not surprised if you do not believe it, but I read it on a Canadian web site. No wonder Islam is taking over, it is at least only partly mad. Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 5 July 2018 2:41:20 PM
| |
https://youtu.be/m0gsj-yweU4
Hi Foxy, A utube video of a lecture, by the Brilliant, Clinical physcologist, Dr.Jordan Peterson. On “The problem with equity” Posted by CHERFUL, Thursday, 5 July 2018 10:19:45 PM
| |
//As for integrating toilets, let's have a plebiscite on the issue and see what the people think :)//
Could we not have one on segregating toilets further? Because I for one am sick of the eternal seat up/down debate. I vote for segregated toilets in private accommodations as well as in public: two toilets in every house, no matter how small, clearly designated Men's and Lady's to prevent any of that unfortunate gender confusion. No wonder kids are confused about their gender when they're raised with unisex bathrooms at home from a young age. And of course men shouldn't be sharing toilet facilities with women. Guys, I don't know if you've heard about this, but women have these things called periods. It's a bit icky. I'll let the video explain: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEvS9RXN43Q Did you hear that? Friggin' alligators, dude. I guess it'd be crocs in Australia. I don't want no crocs crawling out of my toilet when I'm trying to pass a difficult stool. No way, man. Segregated toilets all the way. I mean sure, I did go to Europe over 15 years ago and most of the toilets on the continent were already unisex, before Caitlin Jenner invented transgender people, but that was just to save on space and not because of no funny queer business. And of course, there are no crocodilian species outside zoos in the EU, so they were safe in that regard. Posted by Toni Lavis, Thursday, 5 July 2018 11:29:59 PM
|
You have been showing YOUR true colours of late, by bagging me instead of challenging my comments.
If you don't like what I say don't get up.
It is standard practice, in a fight, if you are loosing or have lost, it means you are on the floor.
The standard speak is 'stay down, stay down'.
Because if you manage to gather the strength and where-with-all to get up.
You will very quickly and painfully find yourself on the floor again.
So the standard M.O. is to stay down.
If you again feel like getting up at least have the decency to respond to at least one of my many propositions.
This is me telling you to stop going off topic and getting back on topic.
Are we clear now?