so what?

So that we can change the world.

Or if we can't change the world,
at least we can embarrass the guilty.

Fox in the henhouse again....

//Part of the concern with the public toilet issue in the US (last year I think) was a push for people to be able to use gender assigned facilities based on how they identified at the time.//

Ahh, those crazy yanks. I travelled to Europe (France & Belgium) many moons ago, and there were unisex water closets all over the joint. It was a bit odd and confronting to an Aussie who was used to segregated dunnies, but the locals were used to it and didn't bat an eyelid. Apparently men and women sharing the same toilet isn't necessarily weird and creepy.

Mind you, some of them had bidets... disgusting.

Isn't it funny how hung up people can get over shite-holes?

Tony hard to see any valid reasons for segregated toilets based on the debate in the US but it appeared they wanted to keep them in the midst of that.

A nonsense debate in my view with extremists on both sides.

R0bert

What about toilets for the disabled?

I don't think they're designated by gender.

So we've advanced a little - right?

Meanwhile the toxic orange haired monster whose natural habitat IS the swamp and who looks like a cane toad holds the future of Earthkind in his tiny pussy-grabbing hands.
At the human level it has no positive human or moral attributes. It makes the legendary shifty outhouse rat look like a paragon of virtue.
As such it embodies all of the worst human aspects. It also appeals to and empowers all of the worst aspects of the American character including the most toxic aspects of its intrinsically hypocritical double-minded religiosity.