Hi Eric G,

I wasn't necessarily promoting suicide, I was promoting personal responsibility.
- Personal Responsibility, which to me also includes ones own mental health.
And it is my business if I have to pay for it.

You make your own choices and you have to live with them.
Exactly what conventions are there on suicide prevention and responsible reporting?
What onus is there on me to take any responsibility for another persons personal problems or have to pay for someone elses gender reassignment / ongoing therapy?
If a person has real physical health related issues, I'll support government paid healthcare.
But if you have identity issues, and you want to cut your bits off, - reshape - whatever - that's not my problem.

If someone wants to kill themselves - If they're determined to do it what can anyone really do to stop them?
Sure you can talk with them and it might fix the problem today;
But it's no-one elses responsibility to give someone else a reason to want to live.
You have to want that all on your own.

"What our society doesn't need is weirdo whackjobs promoting suicide as a good thing."
No, what our society doesn't need is this mentality of people saying 'My problems are everybody elses'
And I'm sick of wrapping cotton wool around everything.

- And look at this stuff - Look what TheAthiest actually said:
"Gender is defined by what you are what your brain tells you, you are."
(and we're all so beaten down by this garbage no-one opposes it)

No, TheAthiest that's not correct, from the moment you're born you're either a male or a female.
That's it; I'm sorry, I don't know what you've been told, but they're they only genders.
You can choose to 'identify' as any of the 50+ genders LisaM mentions but you will only ever have the DNA of a male or a female, and you can't just 'choose' to change it.

AC..

1…The below link is one huge reason, Donald Trump is such a breath of fresh air…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uM9p04wym_U…

2…This book, with theories describing the debasement of modern society, based on scripture, is good value.
https://www.amazon.com/Archon-Invasion-Rise-Return-Nephilim/dp/0985098171

(You may need to copy and paste these links).

Big Nana: I suspect you are one of those older nurses who learned everything they know about medicine while being trained on the job? And perhaps explains your lack of up to date info?

But have the unmitigated intellectual arrogance to profess to be the vessel of all wisdom on matters medical?

You claim that the results of research into identical twins, debunks the possibility of genes being implicated in homosexual behaviour? But where that occurs is the product of choice?

And you cite identical twins to make that point? So let's look at the facts pertaining to identical twins. I note you can also count, which precluded the possibility of an immediate reply!

There can be monozgotic boy girl twins if the sex gene of the embryo has an extra X chromosome. (The fertilised egg would be an XXY) Then when the egg spits, one can have XX (girl) genes and one can have XY (boy) genes. Rare but possible.

As are even rarer combinations or aberrations! Identical twin being rare to begin with! 100% identical? Hardly ever!

Further, Alan Sanders and team, repeat team, of highly credentialed geneticists, found in a study of 818 known homosexual that there was a genetic factor peculiar to homosexuals, namely the genes XQ28 and 8Q12 And also highlighted 3 other SNP's as possibly/probably implicated.

Suggest you get in touch with Alan And his well respected team so they can bow to your, oh so obviously, superior wisdom and knowledge!

You'll have a nice day now y'hear.
Alan B

Hi Diver Dan,
Thanks for the links, but they're not really the kind of videos or books I'd generally like to watch or read.
As far a 'conspiracy' type stuff goes I sway more towards 'Geopolitics' than I do 'tinfoil hat' stuff.
That's not to say I haven't watched videos on say - UFO's, Nephilim, Secret Societies, Satanism, Cattle Mutilations, Bigfoot, Crop Circles etc;
I have watched them, and some of it's interesting - but generally I try to stay away from the 'crazy conspiracy theory' stuff and go for stories that have more merit.
Discussing those kinds of topics would only discredit me; when I have opinions on more important and relevent geopolitical topics, that I'm honestly more interested in.
- Basically, talking about that stuff would do more harm than good -
If I were even interested in talking about that stuff, which I'm not.
- That's the stuff that discredits the alt-right / conservative / truth / liberty movement.

So I stay away from the 'backyard' videos and ones that push a viewpoint with religious undertones like the one you linked;
I want 'facts', not 'narrative and conjecture'; videos trying to 'sell me' one viewpoint or another - with cheap effects and background music.
- Just not interested -
I did support Trump's candidacy, as much as a foriegner can - but I think he's gone against many of the things he said when he ran, he's been a bit of a disappointment, but much better than Hillary or giving the progressives a mandate.
Michelle Obama a man - discussing this will only make you look silly
Barrack Obama - real rather Frank Marshall Davis and being a Muslim - that's true
Doing Coke - no doubt true - but what of it?
- If someone had footage of him doing it and was blackmailing him then that would be a real story...

If I were to purchase books, they'd be more geopolitical related rather than conspiracy related.

AC

There are two views of life. One is through the eyes of science; the other view is faith based.
Science is the “new kid on the block”. Faith based is by far the most fundamental and longest serving to humanity.

Also, ancient religious text is a historic connective tissue to human civilisation , which offers guidance, and warning of impending systemic failure, based entirely on the record of past civilisations struggle with similar abnormal concepts. These are not new times!

You can appeal to all the science in the world, but it will not assist you, to any useful degree, in plotting a moral course to opposition currently on display, from the rise of the inhospitable concepts thrust onto society, concerning gender confusion, for one example. (A concept you are at war with now).

A total view of life through one opened, and the other firmly shut eyes, such as you proposed, will, in the end, leave you bewildered. Science is totally inapplicable to moral guidance.
Except in the rare but beneficial instances, where science can be of use to faith based religions, such as methods to preserve ancient scrolls from decay, or assistance towards archeological discoveries et al, then the two are on different levels, and serve entirely different purposes.

The rise of the Nephilim, is a theory based on genetics. It is a scientifically based argument, melding history with science. You would be pretty stupid not to consider the concept, as an explanation towards an understanding of what may lay behind the worldwide rise of the homosexual political movement, and its relentless march to destroy normal gender concepts. Again, the concept which you state, have little understanding of.

I would appreciate it if someone could let me know when the 'The Rise of Common Sense' is published.