The Forum > Article Comments > The second person of the Trinity: the Son > Comments
The second person of the Trinity: the Son : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 11/10/2017If a kindly Father God was looking down from above ready to intervene for his Son he must have turned aside so as not to see.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Page 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
-
- All
«But..but..the topic is about the Biblical God»
Actually, the topic at hand is the Son of God, the Saviour and, as I prefer to relate to him, the remover of obstacles.
(as I am not a Christian, I have not contributed directly to this topic)
«If he is real with a mind»
Minds are limited and finite, minds exist in order to help us cope in the world: why would God need a mind?
«then wouldn't he do the things you describe - choose, interact and judge?»
Those actions require the existence of two (duality).
Since there is nothing but God, how would this be possible?
Choose among what? Himself and Himself?
Interact with what? There is no other.
Judge whom? Himself?
«causing laws of science. How do you view it?»
I am not bothered about them or how they came about. The laws of science are here for now, that's a fact, and will seemingly continue to operate as long as we remain under the spell of this illusion as if the world is real. My aspiration is to wake up and be released from the bondage of this illusion, so why should I waste my time trying to "understand" more about its internal workings? The solution for nightmares - is to wake up!
---
Dear Not_Now.Soon,
«So far this doesn't seem like a problem that would shift God from existing to not existing»
But existence itself is a limitation. Do you consider God to be limited? Would you worship a limited God?
Both existence and logic can make no sense outside of God.
Is your faith in existence greater than your faith in God?
Is your faith in logic greater than your faith in God?
These are tests.