The Forum > Article Comments > Apprehension about Islam > Comments
Apprehension about Islam : Comments
By Babette Francis, published 8/3/2017It is important to draw a distinction between
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
Posted by Toni Lavis, Thursday, 9 March 2017 6:47:19 AM
| |
Wow, really? Defending mikk?
If I was you, Tony, I'd find somebody who is less of an arsehole than mikk to prostitute your mental vagina for. Because unless you're willing to accept that this http://www.thereligionofpeace.com doesn't exist - guess what? mikk hates you too. What is it with the leftards' lately fashionable adoration and flying to the defence of Islam. All of a sudden they're pretending to be libertarians - BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Posted by Jardine K. Jardine, Thursday, 9 March 2017 7:17:00 AM
| |
Well, come on Kannj, where is the rest of your post proving that “ 90 of your assertion on this topic either false or twisted”?
You sound like another Muslim, totally ignorant of Islam, just parroting what you have been told to say by the mad mullahs. Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 9 March 2017 8:47:10 AM
| |
Killarney says:
"If the West had left Islamic countries alone, then they would have gone through their own 'Enlightenment' and progressed into the modern world." And pigs might fly! Islam cannot, and will not, go " though their own enlightenment" because Islam cannot be changed by man. Islam is the word of Allah, passed onto the the illiterate madman, Muhammed, never to be altered. Before you pontificate on Islam, should should learn something about it. Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 9 March 2017 8:54:10 AM
| |
Ttbn
An apologist for Islam? I have a position on this subject. Quite frankly I'm ambivalent to it. And unlike most of the panic stricken out there, I see the population of Muslims in Australia to be insignificant in term of that cohort being manageable by normal means of state authority; meaning normal policing. That conclusion of course, comes with the proviso that those authorities are not ham-strung by the human rights commission, or some other unknown interference, in their duty to police effectively! My other position on the subject is this. Whether or not we approve of a particular ethnic group in our communities, they have basic rights. One of those is free movement in public without harassment over their religious beliefs. It's a fundamental! It is the moronic radical class in our own society which is overriding that right. It's seems you may be moving your own views in alignment with them, are you not? Posted by diver dan, Thursday, 9 March 2017 10:07:32 AM
| |
Bazz...
I never defend the obviously indefensible ! Problem with Europe on this subject is the open borders policy. That is the main-call for the exit of GB from the Euro.. There onto it! We are not in that league with the problem. If not for Abbott we may well have been though! Many Muslims are removing their children from Islamic schools and replanting them into the secular Public system. There into it! Posted by diver dan, Thursday, 9 March 2017 10:29:02 AM
|
Wow, really? Defending runner?
If I was you, JKJ, I'd find somebody who is less of an arsehole than runner to white knight for. Because unless you're willing to accept that God made the world 6,000 years ago and that the fossil record was laid down in am impossible flood - guess what? Runner hates you too.