The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Shame effects: the risks from public debates and bigotry about the Safe Schools program > Comments

Shame effects: the risks from public debates and bigotry about the Safe Schools program : Comments

By Rob Cover, published 3/3/2016

Through its diversity education training, the Safe Schools Coalition program makes some small headway into trying to make a broader range of sexualities and genders seem normal.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. All
yes Saints child abuse at its highest order just so adults can feel better about themselves. They are one sick lot of cookies. The disgusting feminist/lesbians on Q&A were nothing but overpaid state sponsored bullies along with smirking Jones.
Posted by runner, Sunday, 13 March 2016 7:02:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thanks AC, Saints, and Runner,

"No you people are not normal.
You are messed up in the head.
Its not normal to teach kids in grade 3 about bumsex.
Not now, not ever.

"NOT NORMAL IN ANY WAY.

"Ultimately I've tried to be reasonable on this topic but I don't really care anymore, I think the needs of the majority completely outweigh the needs of a minority and therefore, discrimination and equality aren't nearly as important as protecting kids from this kind of sick agenda."

As an old pruny, semi-Marxist, I can't believe where this idiotic 'debate' is going. Leave kids alone, you perverts. Marxists ? Marx would be utterly disgusted. He would give Gramsci a good kicking.

For Christ's sake, get back to reality. There's enough in the world to be genuinely worried about. The struggle between Islam and the Enlightenment - Marx's world - for example.

Joe.
Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 13 March 2016 7:24:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Runner, Loudmouth

Referring Q & A two weeks ago. I recently read there was a transgender person in the audience who wanted to ask a question of panel. She/he most upset, she/he couldn’t ask a question, and stated that the evening was rigged!

Well, I don’t know if Q & A questions are allegedly “ rigged” not having attended any forums, maybe person should have taken their grievance direct to Mr Jones for response?

However, I must admit last week’s Q & A was a joy to watch. Questions and answers surrounding Science and Mathematics.

Daily Telegraph January 16, 2016 – Trinity Grammar parents rocked by “Sexual abuse among year one boys”.

Quote – “A six year old boy has been removed from prestigious Trinity Grammar School and at least eight others offered counselling after a string of sexual abuses among the Year One pupils.

The abuses involved the boys getting naked and performing sex acts on each other in the school toilets and playground while they were supposed to be supervised.

“Six-year-old boys should not be doing this to other six-year-old boys at school,” said one furious mother. “Clearly the playground and toilets were not supervised. Why didn’t they notice the boys were missing?”

It is alleged the instigator encouraged three other boys to engage in sex acts with at least four other victims in the school toilets and parts of the playground.

An investigation was begun but the main instigator was allowed to remain at the school’s Summer Hill campus.

In 2001 four Year 10 boarders were charged over sexual assaults on boys, including using a wooden dildo called the “anaconda”. They pleaded guilty to assault and were given bonds. Two of their victims were awarded settlements of $500,000 each by the school.

— Last year former Trinity teacher Neil Futcher was charged with multiple offences including the indecent assault of students as young as 11.

— As many as eight Year 8 students were expelled after an incident involving cannabis on the school grounds.” (End of Article)
Posted by SAINTS, Thursday, 17 March 2016 12:11:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
cont'd
There have been some posters who have criticised others when discussing their concerns surrounding toilets, in context with Safe Schools Programme.

The above is a classic example of sexual abuse which could be occurring in other schools and school yards.

Wonder where these 6 year olds obtained info to commit sexual abuse on other 6 year olds?

Nah – nothing to be concerned about, nothing to see here! Sexual abuse occurring in toilets – Nah, of course not!
Speaking about the Early Childhood Australia Program spokeswoman Clare McHugh said the program would reduce domestic violence because “rigid views on gender” were associated with violence and domestic violence.

“Children are sexual beings and it’s a strong part of their identity, and it is linked to their values and respect,” she said.

Ms McHugh – “What is linked to their values and respect” – no value nor respect shown by above 6 year olds to - wonder why?

Maybe its time for time for these 6 year olds to go back and play a bit more in the sandpit.

Approx 2% of the population are “allegedly” L-(?) – therefore the rest those 98% are expected to change our parenting rights in protecting the innocence of our children, for the 2%!

Safe Schools Program should be about respecting all colours, creeds, religions, races etc. ONLY. The L-(?) are no different from anyone else, there’s also nothing “special” about them? They have a right to live their life as they wish/choose, and should be shown the same respect as anyone else….nothing new.

It’s up to each and every school to ensure their code of conduct rules – state zero tolerance level to any bullying. Respect goes both ways.
Posted by SAINTS, Thursday, 17 March 2016 12:13:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
cont'd

Pushing the proverbial L-(?) wheelbarrow agenda – as an alleged “bullying” issue for 2%, on 98% of the population - has no place within our schools, and as such should be “withdrawn” by the Government.

The L-(?) agenda look to having the Safe Schools Program made compulsory for all schools to take up, plus a compliance check every 3 years. I respectfully ask – what about the schools who don’t wish to take up the Safe Schools Programme, as they already have their own strict Code of Conduct rules in place, and don’t believe the material contained in Safe Schools Programme is age “appropriate” in content for many reasons.

The excuse that some L-(?) students are at risk of endangering themselves if the Safe Schools Programme is not implemented – is a load of hog wash.

What about the rights of those students who “don”t wish to have the Programme introduced into their school?

Latest stats reveal 1 in every 15 students leaving school can’t read? Why?

These stats are appalling and may go to answer why students go down a wrong path, feel unable to cope, lack confidence, don't like life, take drugs, commit suicide, can’t get a job. One could go on and on with further effects on a young person’s life and self-esteem.

There is no excuse in this day and age for ANY student not being able to read, having passed through the education system? - totally unacceptable and a national disgrace.

The “Elephant in the Room” is obviously the fact that the education system is seriously failing our youth. With ownership taken by all schools addressing any instance of bullying via new Code of Conduct Rules, bullying will cease. Everyone is a human being, respect should be shown to all. Not hard to implement across all schools – and it’s free.
Posted by SAINTS, Thursday, 17 March 2016 12:14:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy