#plantaganet

If you feel unworthy to comment on the content of my article why try to divert attention from what I write by raising matters that have no relevance?

Dear David,

<<why try to divert attention from what I write by raising matters that have no relevance?>>

Diverting the attention from what you write to what you really wanted to write is a Mitzvah because your whole articles are one big distraction.

No one is so naive as to believe that, in the example of this article, you write about France or care about France and its citizens. Whatever you write, whatever the topic it's supposed to be about, we can see transparently its one and only agenda: to make Israel hold onto the territories it conquered in 1967 and to support the Jewish settlers there.

We will continue to expose you for caring neither for the people of France nor for the people of Israel - only for the ideology of your Jewish sect.

Hi David

Addressing the distorted, tendentious content in your articles is too onerous for most. Hence considerate commenters contribute more material and exercise their Right to discuss other insights.

Just admit that you are a propagandist for Netanyahu and Likud, who may have lost it somewhere, and you'll get more respect from Jews and part Jews alike.

Even anti-Semites will have less to poke fun at and dislike.

Here is a very thought-provoking article, not captured by Netanyahu http://www.richardsilverstein.com/2016/02/24/idf-warns-cabinet-no-military-solution-to-palestinian-intifada/ that I humbly offer.

Pete

#Yuyutsu

I can only repeat for your edification yet again:

I will not respond to any further posts from you until you acknowledge that the killing of civilians by stabbing, car ramming or other targeted attacks is murder and that those who commit such heinous acts are murderers.

Go back to your shark, snake and crocodile exemplars and get their advice.

#plantaganet

You state:

"Addressing the distorted, tendentious content in your articles is too onerous for most."

You have effectively consigned the likes of #Geoff, #Rosty, and #Yuyutsu to the intellectual scrap heap.

But you surely do not put yourself in their category.

Come on - give it a go - and tell me why you disagree with the following conclusions in my article:

"France is being politically naive to believe the failed negotiations conducted over 23 years between Israel and the PLO can be revived.

An international conference aimed at jumpstarting negotiations to resolve sovereignty in Judea and Samaria between Israel and Jordan - not Israel and the PLO - would have made far more sense.

However the only winners from France's proposed conference will be the airlines, the 5 star hotels, 3 hat Michelin restaurants, vignerons and limousine car companies catering to the needs of the delegations flying in for a talkfest that will go nowhere.

Hopefully Islamic State will not spoil the politicians' party."

Why Jordan? it has nothing to do with this.

What is needed for peace in the Middle East, is an agreement whereby the other superpowers allow Chinese forces to enter the West Bank, take the Palestinians away to China and bring in 5 million Chinese settlers in their place, making the West Bank (including East-Jerusalem) an official province of China.

The Chinese are nice people: they don't launch rockets (except when celebrating the Chinese new year or launching satellites), they don't stab people in the streets, they don't ram them with cars, they don't dig tunnels - they will be Israel's and Jordan's best neighbours ever and there will be happiness and prosperity throughout the region.

While there will be no more wars or terrorism and everyone else will be happy (well maybe not the Palestinians, but they deserve it and who counts them anyway), only Singer will still be kicking and screaming - for he doesn't care for the welfare of Israel or Jordan, only for the expansionist ideology of his Jewish sect.