The Forum > Article Comments > Safer schools or a radical Marxist sexual revolution? > Comments
Safer schools or a radical Marxist sexual revolution? : Comments
By Pat Byrne, published 19/2/2016Publicly the person who set up the Safe Schools Coalition program says it’s to stop bullying and suicides, but she told a Marxism conference it was part of a wider Marxist strategy to radically change society.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
Posted by Daffy Duck, Friday, 19 February 2016 3:31:46 PM
| |
I just don't see any possible connection to theoretical marxism and so called sexual freedom?
And just another of those red herrings trying to turn the tide, back towards sexual control and repression? And given that is the aim, bring on the plebiscite and or a government with the courage of its convictions an allow a free vote! For mine, the very next election could be that plebiscite? Rhrosty. Posted by Rhrosty, Friday, 19 February 2016 3:50:48 PM
| |
This is a really sad thing, to see a person half demented given space for the offering up of evidence of a foolish, dislocated and deranged persecution complex.
Pat, the bogy-people are after you... hiding behind every shrub and pot plant, they are watching, every move noted in minute detail before microfilming and off to Moscow. Posted by paul walter, Friday, 19 February 2016 3:58:48 PM
| |
Hi Rhosty,
As an ex-Marxist, I see clear connections between this idiocy and the Gramscian 'march through the institutions of bourgeois society' , how to tear down the society from within if you can't overthrow it (i.e. if the proletariat refuse to play their destined part and throw themselves on he guns of the bourgeoisie, the useless bastards). Marxism contains the seeds of psychosis within it - how to destroy what exists, no matter how. Putting the doubts about one's sexuality into the heads of very young children, when they hardly know the difference, and are utterly unable to demonstrate one way or the other whether they are male or female (or LBGTHKYSGHJYRJYLUIY) - yeah, that should do it. Yeah, let's totally fmqk up society, hee hee ! Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 19 February 2016 4:16:09 PM
| |
Why do we need a sexual revolution? Who is stopping people from doing what they want in terms of sexual behaviour so long as it does no harm to others.
These people do not want a sexual revolution they want a revolution that condemns all criticism of what they do in terms of sexual behaviour. They can already do what they like they just do not like any criticism of what they do and they want anyone who does not agree with their behaviour to be silenced. It has got nothing to do with sex and everything to do with freedom of speech. They want everywhere to be ‘safe’ which means to be free of criticism. If young people commit suicide because not everyone agrees with their sexual behaviour then they have serious issues of insecurity that go way beyond their sexual issues. No one would be so irrational as to commit suicide over criticism of their sexual behaviour so there must be other problems in a person who would do that. If children are being told that their sexual behaviour can never be criticised then how long before it extends to other types of behaviour? We are breeding a generation of kids who will become adults who are too afraid to leave the house lest they stumble across some unsafe individuals who would dare to criticise them for something. Posted by phanto, Friday, 19 February 2016 4:48:56 PM
| |
What happened in communist Russia is completely irrelevant to the situation in 2016.
Furthermore the sexual "moralism" proposed by the NCC in 2016 has very much in common with the sexual "moralism" now promoted by the Russian Orthodox Church in Russia. A situation that has the full "moral" backing of that well known champion of "morality" and "freedom" Vladimir Putin. But who or what "marched through (all of) the institutions" and inevitably ground all previous forms of humanising culture to rubble and dust? Global capitalism and its now 24/7 propaganda machine TV and the advertising industry. Such TV "culture" now rules the entire world and it is fundamentally indifferent towards the health and well-being of all human beings, and all traditional forms of culture. And of course all the non-human beings that live on this mostly non-human planet too. Meanwhile the next generation of children is being systematically brain-washed by TV, their mobile phones, computers and I-pads to become "faithful consumers", dutifully buying all of the brand-name-products that have been implanted in their brains thousands of times by the time they are pre-teenagers. Some pre-packaged "conservative" "education" programs featured in many schools in the USA, and probably here in Australia too require the students to watch slabs of corporate advertising/propaganda every day - such watching being a COMPULSORY part of the package. I believe they are popular with some conservative Christian schools Sharon Beder describes the nature of the all-pervading electronic propaganda brain-washing phenomenon in her truth-telling book: This Little Kiddy Went To Market: The Corporate Capture of Childhood. It is introduced here: http://www.uow.edu.au/~sharonb/kiddy.html Years ago Jules Henry pointed out that THE truly significant cultural revolution occurred when the "advertising industry" inserted itself in the space between children and their parents. Thus becoming the driving force of children's desires for the "good life" with the dominant credo/paradigm now being: I consume/shop therefore I am. If in doubt, boredom or discomfort go shopping. Posted by Daffy Duck, Friday, 19 February 2016 4:56:11 PM
|
But then again what would you expect from someone who is a member of the self-appointed "National" Civic Council.