The Forum > Article Comments > Are we winning or losing the war on terror? > Comments
Are we winning or losing the war on terror? : Comments
By Keith Suter, published 3/10/2014In short, the west is engaged in a 'long war' of low intensity conflict. But politicians and media just bounce along from one event to another without seeing the big picture.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
- All
War mongers and the like that don't want peace may want to do my finger nails as you suggest. But if the war mongers etc know they can get back into their business of selling arms or whatever in the future, they may join in a truce and peace, at least until Ebola is contained.
I am not stupid enough to think war can be averted forever.
My genuine concern is about the already devastated state of whole world ocean seafood supply and unprecedented consequences in trying to feed 7 billion people daily during any new world war, plus impact of Ebola at the same time.
A truce right now would provide a chance to contain Ebola.
A truce would give time to significantly kick re-start the economies of all nations and that could give peace more of a chance long term.
People will go to work instead of war if they can earn $100 a day take home pay, for example.