mind/like-a steal/trap;quote..<<..
Pure Classical Physics Research? Try finding that baby on the web.

Global warming?..“2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night;..>>

ITS/AMASING/LOLnow the bible is proof of warming
but thing mr brain/main-spring/o\sprung-steal..

if/we seen nuthin yet
and is maybe really possably etc[happen/conclusIVLY]..LOL

22 DECMBER/2030/eastern standard time/6 to 60 meters
that sounds more like a sumami

<<..in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.">>

yep thats real change
change change cange
everything stays the same
if its hot its gong to get hotter
if its cold its going to get colder/they have names for people like that/but im one[skeptics]..expepttheir the pessimists/yes the sky is falling..persimists or what?

<<"A NASA study..confirms..>>

confirms/what?
who predicted/what..that nasa/con*-firm,,<<..the Earth constantly receives..more energy..from the sun>>..lol....<<..than it reflects back into space.>>

well dHUHHH
IT CONVERTED/ITS ENERGY/INTO LIFE/PLANTS/COAL ETC

LOL

<<..A massive snow storm....would require a corresponding quantity..>>

OF SUNLIGHT/ENERGY/HEAT..A SNOW STORM/NEEDS COLD/HOT HEAT


<<.of solar energy
for the vaporization,,of its water.
The more massive..>>.LOL..<<..The snow is,..the

greater the quantity..>....WAIT/FOR..IT..<<>.,,of solar energy
required for the vaporization..of its water...Solar Energy...in the form of Radiant Heat..vaporizes the Waters..of the Earth from which the Snow..is produced by God's Nature”..>>

OK SURE..BUT..nature/is energy
as much as its 0PPOSING inversions
A CONSTANT OSMOSIS..AS MATTER/BECOMES ENERGY/AND ENERGY BECOMES MASS

damm caps

Come on mate put this one to bed.
At least you get to stay/and not run away..with a modicum of credibility...Do so and I promise..to mention this again..some/other time.

“ seeing real time human induced geological changes occurring before our eyes but the fears I have for my children and their futures is very sobering.”. Steele, that is loopy. You cling to your faith in AGW, despite the lack of anyscience to support it. You are not as rational as Dowdye, and have the gall to criticize him for his faith, which is a more wholesome faith than yours.Your faith is based on lies, and fraud.
Your attempt to smear Goddard does not detract from his factual report of the tampering by NOAA with the temperature record. Typical of the fraud-backer technique, when there was nothing you could do about the facts, you made an attempt to smear the messenger. What a loser you are, Steele.

Leo, why is the Gulf Stream warming?
Globally surface temperatures have been increasing.
Wildfires in Siberia, months before what had been seen to be the normal fire season, are but some examples of temperature/climate changing.
In an earlier note I gave a reference showing the impact of light on CO2.

It is very interesting that the US is about to launch a satellite to measure CO2 around the globe. A very expensive enterprise for what you term fraud, Leo. Especially, when they had previously tried to launch a similar satellite that crashed when being launched.

After writing the last note, I discovered this site which explains the wildfires in Siberia to a greater extent than other references found.

http://robertscribbler.wordpress.com/

A quote from above site:

"By May, more than a million acres had burned, all well before the typical peak of fire season in July and early August. But that was mere prelude to peak fire season, which we are starting to enter now."

I do not know, ant, what is warming the Gulf Stream, but it is not global warming, because that stopped 17 years ago. As we know, the global warming that we have experienced cannot be shown to be caused by human emissions, despite the considerable failed efforts to show that it is human caused:
‘The US federal government has spent 80 billion US dollars on climate research on the assumption that human caused rise of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a problem. Despite this, no one has yet found even a shred of objective scientific evidence that humans are causing damaging global climate change.
The so called evidence emanates from a vociferous group in the scientific community who, for a variety of reasons, are set on promoting predetermined conclusions not supported by empirical data or real-world observations. The science they rely on is all about the number of scientists who agree with them and claims of consensus to suppress quality control in climate research. “Taking a vote is a risky way to discover scientific truth”
http://anhonestclimatedebate.wordpress.com/tag/chris-de-freitas/

You are really opposed to science, aren’t you ant. Why do you refuse to accept reality? RSS shows temperature has flat-lined

".... but it is not global warming, because that stopped 17 years ago."

What you're referencing is a plateau at record levels of the "surface air temperature".

The dumbness never ends around here.