Tut tut Ant you should know better. A person touting a dismantling of the theory of relativity? Anybody who these characters put up as authorities are usually bonkers, charlatans or in the employ of the fossil fuel industry. But hell, they are the reason I keep coming back here.

Dear SPQR,

Once again you have made my day. The bloke is a religious nutter of the first order. Here is Dr Edward Dowdye Jr's web site http://scienceinthebible.net/

“the presence of advance wisdom and science in the bible - a testimony of a Ph.D. Physicist”

His objective;

“Because of the vast intimidations, the complexities of the modern day sciences and the aggressive onslaught of the non-believers against believers, it is sometime necessary to tool up with the mental blocks, using our own God given talents and minds in defense of the faith. The objective is to help the teaching of those who are challenged by the vast waves of non-sense, sloppy sciences and the attacks against people of faith.”

“The research compiled in this website is based solely on sound fundamentals and solid foundations of the Modern Sciences using Modern Scientific Methods with references to the 66 Books of the Holy Bible.”

His site is a wonder to read.

In it you will find many other scientific facts. For instance SPQR did you know “100 years before the flood at Noah's 500th Birthday the human population on Earth was as great or even greater than today?”

Okay we have had Goddard from Leo now Dowdye from you, can someone make it a trifecta? But please do it tomorrow, I've had my laugh for the day.

Dear Steele,

. The bloke is a religious nutter of the first order.
. The bloke is a religious nutter of the first order
. The bloke is a religious nutter of the first order

He couldn’t possibly have anything of interest or worth to say: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton's_occult_studies

SPQR,

I was going to but in earlier after SteeleRedux exposed your folly...but I kinda felt sorry for you.

Now you compound it!

Did you see that guy's website?

And you reckon he's likely to overturn Einstein's theory which has been proved mathematically over and over again?

http://scienceinthebible.net/

Gee Willikers!

Certainly worthy of your favourite ROFLMAO.

SteeleRedux,if you haven't seen this site it is very interesting in relation to temperature, it is not the site I had mentioned in my previous note.
http://arctic-news.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/high-temperatures-in-the-arctic.html#comment-form

If you type Lance Lesack in the top left hand corner of the arctic-news site you can access information about his study of the McKenzie river which showed how temperatures were increasing from 1958 onwards

SteeleRedux, I had a further search in relation to Dr Edward Dowdye Jr's, I had read that he had peer reviewed articles published in Journals, "as well as a number of other important papers published in some renown refereed journals."
http://www.extinctionshift.com/
As far as his religion is concerned; I wasn't too concerned, as the matter he was commenting on wasn't climate change; his area of expertise is probably not impacted by religion. Fundamental Religious views do impact on views on climate change; John Howard has talked about having "faith" that anthropogenic climate change does not exist. The problem with that view is that "faith" is not held up by appropriate data.

The huge irony here -- which seems to have escaped some-- is that REAL science is about whether specific theories answer the facts …not whether their proposers other views or lifestyle is orthodox.

If you applied Steele’s and Poriot's politically tainted metric to everyone it would disqualify Newton and many of other great thinkers.
{and, in case Poriot and Steele dont know who Newton was -- as seems likely --here's a link for them:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton's_occult_studies)

As champions of science, Poriot would make an unbeatable Abigail Williams and Steele an unsurpassable Thomas Putnam …they would be naaaaaaaaaaaaaaturals!