Raycom asked "Ant, where is the empirical scientific evidence to back your assertion/inference that the anomalous weather patterns are human-induced?"
I have written about it quite a lot in relation to other articles.

Lawrence Krauss, a physicist has just reaffirmed that anthropogenic climate change is occurring on Q&A on Monday night a fortnight ago. You would expect a physicist to know a bit more about physics than other professionals.

What has caused the bodies of Japanese servicemen to to be washed out to sea in the Marshall Islands, reported June 2014?
Why has the fire season been coming earlier and earlier in Siberia, a wild fire was recorded in April 2014?
What about wildfires in Norway in January 2014?
Can you explain Raycom, how water the Inuit had been drinking in Northern Canadas was found to have pathogens (I do have references for these points, a National Geographic reference in this case).
Professor Lesack(2014) in studying the McKenzie River found that temperatures had increased over several decades by 3.2C in Spring, and 5.3C in Winter.
Erosion of coastlines in Alaska no longer protected by ice is occurring; why?
Inuit can no longer travel safely into many areas, why?
Hunting is becoming difficult for the Inuit, why?
Fish are being caught off Greenland that are normally caught further South in warmer waters?
You might like to also explain why small ponds/lakes and small shrubs are beginning to form on tundra?
Why does thermokarst failure occur? What happened to the Richardson Highway in Alaska, was that a case of thermokarst failure?
Why is it that we hear that temperatures have stopped increasing when this decade a number of records have been broken?
continued

continued
You might like to reflect on why in the main glaciers are retreating?
Why is it necessary for hydrology to be studied in the Andes?
What illnesses have been moving North and South from tropical and semi tropical areas?
A paper referenced by 3,000 papers was released last month about changes in climate in the US, and expected changes (NCA).

Oh dear. Raycom. Taken in by the falsehoods of James Delingpole.

This particular one was a howler that two minutes of checking would have shown it for the error that it was, which makes me wonder why Delingpole wrote it.

You can take comfort in not being alone. This was splashed across most of the climate change denier sites in the latter part of March and even into May.

This fiasco should make you question Delingpole's credibility on climate science issues, but I doubt it will.

No battle, nothing to see here, the Gravy Train has moved on. Be creative and invent another scare, how about "Controlling the Media" so that Aliens (ahem, Space) won't think we're nasty?

It is amusing to see that it does not take much to rile the politically-correct DavidK, Agronomist and other AGW believers -- just make reference to notorious sceptical journo, James Delingpole, who obviously gets under their skin.

Ant, your assertions -- even if they include those of physicist Lawrence Krauss -- do not qualify as scientific evidence that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions cause dangerous global warming.

Raycom

Why can't you admit Delingpole LIED?

Just because you chose to spread his LIES does not make them true.

Simple fact-checking gives credibility to argument - spreading LIES gives you no credibility.