Agnostic (what a laugh that name is),

Good try but no matter how many facts you put before them, you can never get deniers such as Agnostic and his/her comrades to change their views.

you are so right individual. the following link shows your truth.

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/bas_research/science_briefings/icecorebriefing.php(7)

It contains some data supported evidence in the following statements. I cannot argue with data supported evidence and nor can you.

'It is often said that the temperature ‘leads’ the CO2 during the warming out of a glacial period. On the most recent records, there is a hint that the temperature started to rise slightly (at most a few tenths of a degree) before the CO2, as expected if changes in Earth’s orbit cause an initial small warming. But for most of the 6,000-year long ‘transition’, Antarctic temperature and CO2 rose together, consistent with the role of CO2 as an important amplifier of climate change (see Fig. 4). In our modern era, of course, it is human emissions of CO2 that are expected to kick-start the sequence of events. We see no examples in the ice core record of a major increase in CO2 that was not accompanied by an increase in temperature.'

Ask ant for clarification if you have difficulty comprehending the consequences of this link.

Agnog

'You have probably noted that they fail to produce a shred of broadly accepted science, a single published, peer reviewed scientific paper in support of their views.'

There is one that supports my view that matches your requirements and what is more it was presented to a warmist magazine and written by warmist scientists.

I believe in climate change but I don't believe it has been caused by human co2 emissions.

Here is that link, with recorded data, that supports my position. It was first supplied by ant.

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/bas_research/science_briefings/icecorebriefing.php(7)

If you don't understand the consequences of it's data and it's assertions, check with ant.
He has had it explained to him ... more than once.

What “science” is it that we do not accept, Agnostic? You do not have any.

When I asked you for the science to demonstrate that human emissions have any measurable effect on climate, you disappeared. Now you resurface with the same baseless nonsense. Did you learn nothing from the realization that you have no science to back your position on the AGW fraud?

• “"Man-made emissions of CO2 are clearly not the source of atmospheric CO2 levels
• Satellite observations show the highest levels of CO2 are present over non-industrialized regions, e.g. the Amazon, not over industrialized regions
• 96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made
• Net global emissions from all sources correlate almost perfectly with short-term temperature changes [R2=.93] rather than man-made emissions”

• That is from Murry Salby, Chair of Climate Science at Macquarie University
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/climate-scientist-dr-murry-salby.html

Why do you not accept the science , Agnostic? We are Realists, who accept Climate science,while you, of course, are a denier.

Page Not Found
Home » About this Site » Redirect » Page Not Found »

The page you requested:

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/bas_research/science_briefings/icecorebriefing.php(7

...cannot be found.
We suggest you try one of the following options:
Seach page - A search of www.antarctica.ac.uk powered by Google
Site Map - A listing of all our pages by section.
A to Z - A listing of all our pages by title.

Imajulianutter,
Is that from one of the GW proponents, because how on earth are they doing research when they spell like this 'Seach page-
:-)

You are funny Leo, after all the comments you have made about fraud of climate scientists

http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/07/12/murry-salby-sacked-australian-university--banned-national-science-foundation

http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Murry_Salby.htm

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2011/08/06/bag-of-hammers-ii/

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/jul/19/climate-change-contrarian-wretched-week