Yes, ant, your effort to divert us from the fact that you have failed to produce any science to show any measurable effect of human activity on climate is as desperate as it is obvious .

You show incredible ignorance in your earlier post in assertions based on a false belief that correlation is proof of causation. In the real world, the rise in CO2 content in the atmosphere has not resulted in the fraud-backers predicted rise in global temperature

Andrew Bolt is correct about Tuvalu. You have made baseless inferences that Bolt was wrong, with nothing specified to support your false statements Where in your view, was he wrong?
If you had any respect for fact, you would not have referred us to the ridiculous greeny video asserting sea level rise at Tuvalu, which they made at a time that the sea level at Tuvalu had actually fallen. As is your habit you tried to justify this fraud when it was made obvious that they were lying.

We are still waiting for you to set out your justification for backing the AGW fraud. We accept that you have no science which shows any measurable effect by human activity on climate, so please set out your basis.

Leo, a film clip showing water going through people's houses after Bolt stated there was no such problem reflects on Bolt.

My last post was about 80 studies that stated that CO2 shows a direct link to temperature increasing. That is, CO2 being the active part prior to warming.
In the study that I had provided originally it did state there is a relationship between CO2 and temperature creating a feedback system.

Leo, you cannot answer the matters I put out in my last post. The problem for you is that you are not able to answer them. They have not been contrived by me, its what is happening in 2014.

What is your answer to the warming that is happening Leo?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNql8BiAijw

The clip can be copied and pasted.

No flooding in Tuvalu, Leo.

It doesn't matter what else you say you totally undermined your own claims of AGW. Faced with a truth from your own authority you cannot let go of your disproven belief.

That is nuts.

Is the British Antarctic Survey no longer a reliable authority?

Can I now assume anything they say is also unreliable?

I note you also evade not only the evidence presented by your own cited authority but you also evade my questions.

Ant you are pathetic and the more you try to evade the findings of your cited authority the more pathetic you look.

More grist,
http://content.csbs.utah.edu/~mli/Economics%207004/Marcott_Global%20Temperature%20Reconstructed.pdf or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_large-scale_temperature_reconstructions_of_the_last_2,000_years
CO2 concentration has risen at an unprecedented rate? Why isn't it caused by man if nothing else explains it?

If temperature leads CO2 concentration, I wonder why a recent temperature hiatus has not caused a hiatus in CO2? If CO2 concentration leads temperature where has all the heat gone? http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/index.htm

“No flooding in Tuvalu, Leo.”

Correct, ant, but the greenies contrived a video to falsely pretend that there was, and still had time to rip out an old tree that proved that there had been no sea level rise at Tuvalu. Their skills have expanded since the days when they just put a plastic bag in the mouth of a dead marine animal they found, and photographed it.
As I said correlation n does not prove causation, unless the scientist is a fraud-backer, and the same principle applies as when a hot day will prove global warming, while a sattelite photo of countries frozen in snow and ice is just “weather.
You can certainly find some rubbish on the web, ant, but it has the same effect as your own rubbish. Thinking persons do not believe it. We do not have global warming, which is the reason that the fraud backers every year proclaim “hottest year on record”. They are desperate for a warming trend.

Remember the Climategate miscreant, Professor Phil Jones, and his email: “ We can’t show global warming, and it’s a travesty that we can’t” Under cross examination he said that there had been no global warming since 1995? That makes it 19 years since warming stopped, if you believe him, because there has been no warming since he was questioned.

But you have found a site, haven’t you, ant where they say that human emissions are causing melting of the ice at the poles.This is scaled down from the nonsense of a few years ago, when the ice was melting so fast that the scientists were having difficulty keeping up with their observations. I heard it on the ABC, that unceasing channel of AGW fraud.
Do you really believe this garbage which you inflict on us?

Imajulianutter and Leo, a bit hard to argue against 8o sources that are showing that carbon dioxide is the agent causing warming.

John Tyndall indicated there was a relationship between carbon dioxide and warming about 150 years ago.

You can’t answer the various questions I have asked about what is happening in 2014?

You might like to add why the methane being voided by the tundra and sea beds is of no concern

Please provide references to show that what has been happening in the last few years is wrong.