The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The IPCC now says it’s OK to adapt to ‘climate change’ > Comments

The IPCC now says it’s OK to adapt to ‘climate change’ : Comments

By Don Aitkin, published 11/4/2014

It seems to me that the IPCC may well be coming to the view that if it is to survive, it will have to have more than the mitigation arrow in its quiver.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. ...
  14. 21
  15. 22
  16. 23
  17. All
i really CANT BE BOTHERED CATCHING UP..ON THE DEBATE
BUT A POINT WAS MADE RE ICE MELTING..AND ALGAE BLOOMING
THE THING IS..WARMING OF THE OCEANS..IS CAUSE THERE is more heat warming the oceans..[right?}

well algae is turning the light off/blocking the sun-light/heat
like an umbrella turning that energy into carbon capturing life.

ie THE EARTH COMPENSATES c02/SATURATION/is/BY 'BLOOMING'

NOW GET Over this man made delusion
that has one cure triple the cost of energy..AND GIVE POLLUTERS A NEW new industry/PRODUCT..to increase their 'productivity'..read energy wastage.

READ THIS AND WEEP
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=light+bulb+conspiracy

YA DRINK YA SOY LATTES/[GROWN ON smashed AMAZON FORREST]
YA EAT YA BIO ORGANIC PAlM OIL..FROM YET OTHER LIVING BIOTA
YA DOWN ON MEAT EATING yet think nothing of murdering many/endless living seeds to make ya fake meat/ya fake milk and ya fake feel good soy latte

let ye without sin
not throw anymore stones.
yes pollution is bad/sending us broke so govt can prop up industry..is insane/

we near destroyed this earth to get here.
this greedy re-industrialization is that step too far that kills us.

get it its life and death/if green wins
we all dead/when the pole shifts..and sunlight goes away..for a year and one day..and cyclonic winds will rip apart the wind array/to save the earth your willing to kill it..its insanity..and a cant be bothered back tracking to who said what.

its you greenie types that want solar in-dust-wry
that want wind industry..that want electrick/cars
that want/..them 10 DOLLAR LIGHT BULBS THAT BURN OUT AFTER 60 HOURS USE
Posted by one under god, Friday, 18 April 2014 1:30:56 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
one under god,

With so many apparent dislikes, what do you eat?
I like a good mature grass fed steak, absoutely without sauce.
A2 milk, organic butter and soil-grown vegetables as well.

Ocean algae seems to like N&P and iron.
If nutrition is not adequate then algae will not thrive and bloom.
Evidence of substance indicates that if unprecedented human sewage nutrient loading dumped daily was not all over the place these days, there would be less nutrient loading and less algae.

I just put my hand on top of algae in a sunlit pond and could easily feel distinct warmth compared to cooler clear water right alongside.

It is not a matter of being a greenie or warmist or sceptic in order to have an open mind and common sense.
Posted by JF Aus, Friday, 18 April 2014 3:01:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ant, it's in FAR; I can't believe someone who throws around so many links from SKS like you do can't find it.

Sea level rise is declining ant; as I showed; how can alleged sheet ice and glacier melt be increasing sea level when it is declining?

I come across people like you who kitchen sink references from the usual alarmist sites without a clue. Think about what you're linking to.

So, I repeat, if all this melting ice is going into the sea why isn't sea level rise increasing and why is the steric component of sea level rise non-existent if heating is melting the ice?

And how is the sheet ice melting when the temperatures in Greenland and the Antarctic don't exceed 0C?
Posted by cohenite, Friday, 18 April 2014 3:03:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
cohenite, in a past post I have indicated that I have searched FAR.
I think your Goddard has been trying to pull wool over people's eyes.

Please provide the particular IPCC FAR reference, I believe you are unable to do so.

cohenite, when you consider the enormity of seas and oceans a large volume of water is required to raise water levels.
A recently published book certainly says water levels are increasing so do large numbers of other references:

http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/64/1/69.full

http://ocean.nationalgeographic.com/ocean/critical-issues-sea-level-rise/

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/impacts/causes-of-sea-level-rise.html

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/oceans/sea-level.html

http://www.climatechange.gov.au/climate-change/climate-science/climate-change-future/sea-level

JS Aus, I typed into Google "impact of algae on CO2"

http://www.co2science.org/subject/a/summaries/algae.php

http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/11451/1/m373p285.pdf

http://allaboutalgae.com/benefits/

http://phys.org/news/2013-03-algae-capture-co2.html

From what I can gather algae is more likely to take up CO2 than be a problem.
Posted by ant, Friday, 18 April 2014 4:41:54 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You're a funny little thing ant; or you would be funny if AGW wasn't such a gigantic, corrupt imposition on the peoples of the world.

The Graph is in FAR; I'm looking at it now:

http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/screenhunter_170-jun-15-11-10.jpg

It's in here ant:

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/far/wg_I/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf

ant says:

"A recently published book certainly says water levels are increasing"

Yes they are ant, but at a DECREASING rate; if AGW were real as you say they would be increasing at an INCREASING rate.

You do know about rates and changes in rates don't you ant? Once again the evidence against AGW is there before your eyes but like the good little worker you are you just keep plugging up that leaky vessel called AGW.
Posted by cohenite, Friday, 18 April 2014 5:02:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Cohenite, you say, ".......the temperatures in Greenland and the Antarctic don't exceed 0C?

So why is it so that temperature in Greenland is officially reported to have reached a highest ever recorded high of 78.6F ?

I think I understand a likely cause other than what is stated at the following link, but it's not due to CO2 emissions.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/08/01/greenland-soars-to-highest-temperature-ever-recorded/
Posted by JF Aus, Saturday, 19 April 2014 8:14:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. ...
  14. 21
  15. 22
  16. 23
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy