The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Should we force fluoride? > Comments

Should we force fluoride? : Comments

By Emily McAuliffe, published 18/4/2013

Fluoridation is the perfect example of an ethical dilemma, as there are convincing advocates for and against. How do we know who to believe?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 13
  9. 14
  10. 15
  11. All
Sodium Flouride is a poison.Read the safety advice on your toothpaste.Hitler used it on the Jews.

One commentor suggests that Dentists know best.Did they know best when thay put amalgams in our teeth? Mercury is one of the most deadly metals known to man.They used to stiffen hats with mercury which sent people crazy.Hence we have the expression,"Mad as a hatter."
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 18 April 2013 9:13:05 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Fluoride isn't a single chemical, it's a compound, or if you will, a salt.
Fluoride occurs naturally in nature, but only as calcium fluoride.
It only ever hardens tooth enamel as it passes over around the teeth and reacts with it or is absorbed in PPM.
Calcium fluoride is also an essential in cell development/renewal.
However, sodium fluoride is a man made compound or a waste product of aluminium smelting.
It is highly toxic and as such, is an excellent rat poison.
Dentists will confirm, it only ever benefits the teeth as it washes over and around them.
That there is no point in taking fluoride tablets, given once ingested, it does absolutely nothing for tooth enamel.
Yet this same group keep on insisting we are mass medicated with SODIUM FLUORIDE.
Some very long term studies in the US seem to indicate that this practise may be implicated in bone deformities, and may be cumulative and carcinogenic?
Why sodium fluoride?
Well as a industrial waste product, it is cheap!
Moreover, unlike calcium fluoride, it doesn't stain the teeth brown, which is the principle result of drinking naturally fluoridated water.
One would suggest it be taken as a voluntary supplement, used as a gargle, several times a day, be included in all toothpaste, and people brush and floss not less than three times a day.
That Calcium fluoride be included in chewing gum, and that everyone with their own teeth, chew that after meals.
Dentists are not doctors, are not as well trained in general medicine, and are clearly not cognisant of the long term SODIUM FLUORIDE studies in the US, which indicate some possible problems, and possible extremely expensive class actions, against all those who've been implicated in any way, in forcing rat poison down the necks of the populace.
Any published evocation, ought to be kept as possible future, hard copy, evidence!
Anyone would think, that these advocates, had significant shareholdings in bottled water companies or tank manufacturers, or Memtech filter supply companies, all the options available, to avoid illegal, mass medication!
Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Thursday, 18 April 2013 9:26:48 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"It is a demonstrably effective publich health measure."
Posted by stickman

I'm getting depressed seeing the price of electricity going up, and reading poor spelling.

Maybe the government can mass medicate the drinking water with anti-depressants as well?

Where do some of you get off thinking you have a right over my body? I own a toothbrush and paste, as do my family. We even know how to use them.

What Australia needs is tooth brush courses for those that think like Stalin.
Posted by aussiedavo, Thursday, 18 April 2013 10:34:15 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Fluoride has been in our water supply here in Australia for decades.
Do we have massive numbers of people experiencing symptoms of poisoning ?
No we don't.

Do we have much improved teeth amongst our population?
Yes we do.

That's enough for me.
Posted by Suseonline, Thursday, 18 April 2013 11:06:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This is one for the tin foil hat brigade. I'm all for individual rights but this is where the libertarians fall flat on their face. Anti- immunization supporters the same. If flouride was a problem I think we'd know by now, don't you?.
Posted by Atman, Thursday, 18 April 2013 11:14:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Susanonline.Sodium Flouride is a cumulative poison and like "Boiling frogs syndrome" we will realise it too late.What studies have they done to prove it's safety? Don't we have enough toxins already in our bodies? Also,where is our freedom to choose?

It would be better to use Calcium Flouride but then they'd have no where to sell their industrial waste.

Obama has just past legislation to increase drasically the allowable levels of radiation in the environment.They also did this in Fukushima.Some say cancer levels rise from 1:10,000 to less than 1:100.Can we trust our Govts?
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 18 April 2013 11:22:57 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 13
  9. 14
  10. 15
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy