When the intelligent world is moving away from the concept of organised religion that is used to enslave us and keep us ignorant.Why do intelligent Jews need a country that is so oppressive to the Palistinians and drags their past good deeds through the mud of this modern day fascism?

People like Albert Einstein would be disgusted at what the Zionists have perpetrated not only on their own people,but the enslaving of our common humanity in deception,treachery and ignorance.

To #csteele

I have made it clear to you on umpteen occasions that my use of the terms "Jews","Arabs" and "Palestinian Arabs" correctly describe the participants to a conflict that has raged for 130 years.

Ottoman and British Mandate Censuses counted the people as "Jews", "Moslems" and "Christians".

The Mandate for Palestine in 1922 spoke of the Jewish people, the Jewish National Home" and the "existing non-jewish communities in Palestine". Not a mention of "Palestinians"

The 1947 UN Partition Plan spoke of one Arab State and one Jewish State.

The term "Israelis" never existed until 1948. The term "Palestinians" was first defined in the PLO Charter in 1964.

Use of these terms mislead people into believing the Jewish- Arab conflict in Palestine started in 1948 and not in about 1880.

They mask a refusal to consider the San Remo Conference, the Treaty of Sevres, the Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the United Nations Charter - the legal sources of the right granted to the Jews to reconstitute their national home in Palestine.

They conveniently ignore the Arab riots, massacres and killings perpetrated on Jews between 1880-1948, the migration of vast numbers of Arabs to Palestine (much of it illegal)as growing Jewish emigration made Palestine economically viable and attractive.

They serve as a pretense to making people believe the Jewish-Arab conflict started only when "the Israelis" declared their independence.

Such language serves to conceal that the National Home set aside for the Jewish people was located in just 0.01% of the captured Ottoman Empire - whilst the Arabs got the other 99.99% as part of a package deal agreed to by the League of Nations in 1920.

Most OLO posters here use the terms "Israelis" and "Palestinians" - not "Jews" and "Arabs".

Is their use deliberate with the above objectives in mind or merely the result of ignorance?

Why do you choose to use "Israelis" and "Palestinians" rather than "Jews" and "Arabs"?

#csteele - You have just given me another great idea for a further article on brainwashing and its effect on the Jewish-Arab conflict.

David Singer,
I look forward to that article, most people seriously believe that Israel was founded "because of the Holocaust", as far as I understand Shoah survivors made up only about 10% of the Israeli population by 1960.

David Singer refers to "the San Remo Conference, the Treaty of Sevres, the Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the United Nations Charter - the legal sources of the right granted to the Jews to reconstitute their national home in Palestine."

What part did the Palestinians play in the San Remo Conference, and in formulating the Treaty of Sevres and the Mandate for Palestine, and formulating or voting for (either will do) article 80 of the United Nations Charter. None? Thought not. The days of people meekly accepting rules drawn up for them by foreign colonialists are over, thank goodness.

Oh, and by the way, where does the "re" in "reconstitute" come from? Do the people of the world accept the "re"? Do the Palestinians? Do the 7 billion goyim count?

David Singer,

< the National Home set aside for the Jewish people was located in just 0.01% of the captured Ottoman Empire - whilst the Arabs got the other 99.99% as part of a package deal agreed to by the League of Nations in 1920.>

In all of your propaganda articles this statement is singularly the most illustrative of the moral bankruptcy of Zionist ideology. All the inhabitants of the region are "Arabs" and therefore indistinguishable from any other Arab, any "Arabs" living on the land required by the Zionists would simply be moved aside, one way or another. They could always move in with other Arabs in a "Bantustan" somewhere else, after all they're all the same and who cares, certainly not most representatives of the declining imperial countries and definitely not most Zionists.

The fact that "just 0.01 % " of the land was the Palestinians' ancestral home counted for nothing because the people living on that land were "Arabs".

To #Emperor Julian

The Arabs were not innocent babes in the woods.

They were trying to get 100% of any territory captured from the Ottoman Empire even before the war was over. They only ended up with 99.99% and were furious to learn that the remaining 0.01% they thought had been promised to them - was not to be theirs.

Can you believe it - arguing because they missed out on 0.01% of the territorial spoils of victory won from the Turks?

That's when San Remo, the Treaty of Sevres, and the Mandates for Palestine,Mesopotamia and Syria kicked in. The Brits and French committed the promised 99.99% to Arab self-determination and the remaining 0.01% - called Palestine - to Jewish self-determination.

The Arabs still want to swallow that 0.01% in 2012. Voracious appetite but exceedingly poor judgement.

You also ask - where does the "re" in "reconstitute" comes from?

It appears in the Mandate for Palestine document which reads:

"Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country;"

Shucks Emperor Julian - All the goyim of the world whose countries were then members of the League of Nations agreed to that "re" word.

The whole world - goyim and others - recognized that promise to the Jews when the UN Charter was drawn up in 1945 and Article 80 was included.

Perhaps you might now begin to understand why #csteele is so hung up on me using the words "Arabs" and "Jews" and not the terms "Israelis" (not in existence until 1948) and "Palestinians" (not in existence until 1964)

This conflict sure started before 1948.

#csteele just doesn't want anyone to know about that.

The deliberate use of the terms "Israelis" and "Palestinians" is nothing more than a form of obsessive Jew-denial and Jew-hatred.

Just hope you are one of the brainwashed innocents caught up in this semantic cover up and not one of its deliberate perpetrators.

Your ignorance of pre 1948 history seems to suggest this is so.

Wake up.