It is amazing how this great truth:AGW, is so afraid of challenges.
There is always reason why this or that critic should not be listed to.

There was an interesting article in last weeks Sun Herald about just how findings that run counter to the official AGW narrative are being
silenced,makes you wonder--or leastways, it should:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/stars-party-as-we-burn/story-e6frfhqf-1226213210427

'Twas the last night at Durban, and all through the house.
Not a creature was stirrin, 'cept a li'l Belgian louse
The reparations list complete & plastered on high
In hopes great cargo-cult lord would rain manna from the sky

And the delegates were snug in their fresh maid beds
While visions of hand-outs danced in their heads.
And Ban-Ki in his ray-bans, and Gore in his Gucci
Had just settled down to chat in the Jacuzzi

When down in the lobby there arose such a clatter
I sprang from my bed to see what was the matter
Real Julia had arrive,with tan Tim in toe
That's Julia the green for those in the know

But her spiel killed hopes & sunk delegate hearts
"Was she really telling 'em it's time to play your part?"
Well they thanked her for industry that her tax sent their way
But told her "we don't understand your language" if you want us to pay

said "If there be no more freebies, Durban's no place for us".
"It's quick down that free beer, and on the next airbus"
"We'll confer with ole Ban-ki to see what he proffers"
"And check in next confab to see whats on offer".

Good poem SPQR, reminds me of the poetry of another OLOer.

Oh yeah, that opinion piece by Miranda Devine - same old same old.

Every time I get attacked personly on this site,I know I'm hitting a nerve of truth.Yu Yu is yet another in long list.He has no replies, only derision.

Russia has moved 3-4 Nuclear subs + 2 wars ships and armed Syria with X 300 advanced missiles which can destroy shipping.Israel is pushing for and attack on Iran under the lie of having not even one nuke while Israel has an est of 75-400 nukes.Iran says it has thousands of missiles than can stop most of the oil coming out of the Middle East.What will that do for a collapsing world economy?

Every time a US President comes here our leaders fall over themselves grovelling for approval.It is sickening.If we don't stand up to the war mongering elites in the West,they will take us down the path of destruction.Russia and China will no longer back down or accept the invasion of sovereign countries under the lie of terrorism.Putin regets not intervening on the Libyan invasion.

Ordinary people be they Jewish,Islamic,Christian or Buddhist have never wanted war.Only the psychopathic war mongerers who want absolute power crave war.Mostly they are our leaders.They have never stopped plotting and scheming throughout history to achieve their evil ends.

It is time all people around the planet rose up put an end to this insanity.

Live by the truth or die by the lie.

<< what kind of impact do you think a one metre rise in sea level will have on 50 million people living in the deltas of Bangladesh, for example?

Do you think it will have an impact on the number of 'refugees' arriving in Australia by boat, for example?>>

So by extension, if I should decide to build on a sandbank off Bondi, and get swamped. I would be entitled to a whole lot of compensation from your great green climate fund. And I might even be entitled to re-settle on your front lawn as a climate refugee.

Whooppee! I can see why this will be a growth industry--there must be a least a billion potential (ab)users in south Asia alone.

David
Okay, read that.

And what do you say it proves that is relevant to the Durban conference?

Or rather, obviously you think it does prove something relevant, or you wouldn't have posted it. And so obviously you don't recognise the glaring gaps in your line of reasoning, or you wouldn't have exhibited them so candidly.

The problem is that the whole AGW belief system just keeps on getting disproved, and just keeps on popping up again like one of those grinning punching clowns that is biased at base:
a) you haven't established that glaciers melting is happening because of man-made global warming.
b) you haven't established, and wikipedia doesn't even try to establish, whether the downsides of AGW would be greater than the upsides, and how you would know, nor even what data set you would need to start pronouncing on it, and
c) you haven't established whether the upsides of a policy would outweigh the downsides, and how you would know.

You haven't shown how you know that a voluntary response would not be better, all things considered, than a coerced response.

So once we again, all we get are endless presumption, and the belief that AGW's protagonists should have a privilege to tell everyone else to do, destroying people's freedom, livelihood, lives and the environment as they go.

And they go straight from a supposed problem to the conclusion that bureaucratic central planning of the world's climate and ecology would be better for man and the environment BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You guys should be ashamed of your presumption and ignorance.