The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > On Spiritual Atheism > Comments

On Spiritual Atheism : Comments

By Ben-Peter Terpstra, published 17/5/2011

To whom or what was Julia Gillard praying, since she tells us she has no god.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 54
  7. 55
  8. 56
  9. Page 57
  10. 58
  11. 59
  12. 60
  13. 61
  14. All
sand piper..the post mimits are allways a worry
but there is no need to post the full..ps-ALMS
they were poasted to give the gist...that leads to ps-ALM 8

IM more intrested in hearing
from those WHO CLAIM PROOF
of not god doing it

ie those A-thiests
who think their belief is more pure
because they THINK they have fact...[but in reality only being blinded..by fact...

..not science that IN ANYWAY...validates their belief..
in sports/monsters..ie..[mutt-ations]..
they think is evolution..but science KNOW's is only error]

there are no facts for evolution of genus
there is no experiment...that can validate such huge evolutionary jumps as cold blood fish...'evolving',into warm blooded mouse..

as much as athiests
may think to get aid and comfort from the lie..
the science alone..rebuts their absurd belief...

i ask them for THEIR proof
they dont got none

the facts are plane

but so too the wotrds of the christ
[born of woman..thus pure man]
sustained to live by the one true living loving good [god]

who in being part of gods creation..canot be god [creator]

all who have faith
be it faith in science
or faith in the wrong ideas..of/about jesus mahamoud
or even of a wrathfull/judgmental god....build their faith on sand

just as building faith on just a few ps-ALMS
or this gospel or that gospel...is only telling ONLY..part of the story

then we get to the translations
and various edditings of the holy texts
quoting them...in lol..new english..changes their old meaning

but that is a whole topic in itself
[for now the best we can do is minimise any referance to israel
[a modern construct...subverting a holy place..

long ago made unholy
now even worse than sodam and gonnarea

names change over time
meabnings change overtime

lets have
a gay ol time...?
but lets not cast good after ill
gopd is love life logic...

its time to get over the other deciets and lies
jesus said we can know god in person..[one to one]

no special incantations in latin needed
no special tent or special clothes..or rites or wrongs
Posted by one under god, Monday, 20 June 2011 7:50:47 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
OUG,

"In the beginning was the word, and the word was good.
And God commanded: "Go Forth and Multiply".

The heavens rolled back, the sky cleared, and upon the Earth arose Life.
Life in a multiplicity, oozing, writhing, darting, swimming and crawling emerged and merged, filling all corners of the Earth in myriad form, and it was good. Eon by eon, Life, in super-abundance, branching, turning and forking on many paths, splendid and marvelous.

And so it was, and so it will be."

We may only hope that the good God may be well pleased.

We must also hope, and endeavour to ensure, that we, seeming custodians and caretakers of all which has been so provided, do not destroy and bring down that which is good. Temporary only, in transience, as all is also in transience, to admire, to enjoy, and to remain in wonder.
Posted by Saltpetre, Monday, 20 June 2011 11:17:25 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'Some perfumes are as sweet as infants' flesh'

In a Dennis Ferguson kinda way?

...

Oh come on!

It's a compulsion I have; To ruin things.

WmTrevor,

You are a true mentor and encourager of lost children the way you encourage my juvenile jester routine by giving it respect it doesn't deserve.

I suppose there is wisdom in the most juvenile contributions, even if it is via self-projection by those seeking some truth. So, work with the Ferguson comment to your heart's content. Take up the challenge.

'Houellebecq, if not actually confronting a mysterious secret is at least responding to it.'

Like I said elsewhere, I would only bother to ponder the existence of a creator if I had somehow nailed down whether or not I do actually exist.

But sex is central to life, orgasm mirrors the stages of life, and let's not forget drugs, and so why not a pair of tits summing up the '42' of life. Sounds more poignant than a lot of the theories out there. 'Cause let's face it the tits on a woman's chest are infinitely more noteworthy than the tits that pontificate about the world. More nourishing and enriching, emotionally and physically, and more likely to show the way to true Nirvana.

Poirot,

"An artist must be in his work like God in creation, invisible and all powerful, he should be everywhere felt, but nowhere seen."

You're tempting me to promote the idea of Jedi midi-chlorians?

'Houellie mentioned the symbols which are part of our world, and our subconscious immersion in their meanings.'

Well I suppose I am guilty as charged. It annoys me actually to find out my theories are actually well established strains of philosophy. It's why I refuse to read any stuff like that as I learn how un-clever and unoriginal my observations are. No doubt not nearly as annoyed as the original authors would be when Hollywood acquires them for science fiction from the Matrix to Star Wars.

You're not the first to think....

Does that not annoy you lot? Make you feel like you're wasting your time?
Posted by Houellebecq, Monday, 20 June 2011 12:40:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
OUG,

Talk to me about the ethics of this woman who knocked on my door yesterday and prompted her 8 year old child to lecture me about Jesus, then added her own quick lecture before leaving me a leaflet on loss of a loved-one?

I see it all as rather exploitative and manipulative on many levels, and it really put a dampener on my party. I nearly invited them in as I was hosting a child's birthday party!
Posted by Houellebecq, Monday, 20 June 2011 12:41:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Really, Houellebecq?

>>... I was hosting a child's birthday party<<

Not by any chance "in a Dennis Ferguson kinda way?"
Posted by Pericles, Monday, 20 June 2011 2:49:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Houellebecq quote/"""You're not the first to think....

Does that not annoy you lot?""

not in the least
its good to be able to think
to not be destracted by tits or twits
[as in birds and nit wits

""Make you feel like you're wasting your time?""

not in the least
i love communing with my betters
even those who think their parents were apes
[if they put themselves down like that...who am i to contradict them]

but when they ignore the truth
and try to push fairy tales..or redirection to tits
well THEN..it becomes clear..
they got no facts..

only a vague concept..they call lol science
that is purely..>"faith in 'evolution'



""OUG,Talk to me about the ethics
of this woman who knocked on my door yesterday
and prompted her 8 year old child to lecture me about Jesus,""

thats child abuse
children MUST BE GIVEN...the real facts
[not sopin and lies...not telling them the lie..that evolution
THEO_RY..made them from apes...nor the lies that god judges them

""then added her own quick lecture
before leaving me a leaflet on loss of a loved-one?""

you must have noted her tits?
[sorry had to push that button...but mate MAYBE
thats her way of copping in the loss of another...'loved one']

go easy on her...just as she should go easy on the kid
even in the after life....kids are taught..

then must chose
to look at titts in heaven...or the boobs in hell

""I see it all as rather exploitative
and manipulative on many levels,""'

so do i
but what of those telling kids lies
telling kids it wasnt god..yet UNABLE TO PROVE IT WAS OR WERNT

""and it really put a dampener on my party.""

sorry bloke
happy birthday
send email will send you some tits

""I nearly invited them in as I was hosting a child's birthday party!""

well mate thats why they got boyscouts/girlguides..for
KIDS DESERVE TO BE ALLOWED TO CHOSE

but based on KNOWN truths
not beliefs or lies

better athiests simply say
we dont know..than look foolish
if not being able to present..*ANY fact
Posted by one under god, Monday, 20 June 2011 4:25:47 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 54
  7. 55
  8. 56
  9. Page 57
  10. 58
  11. 59
  12. 60
  13. 61
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy