The Forum > Article Comments > On Spiritual Atheism > Comments
On Spiritual Atheism : Comments
By Ben-Peter Terpstra, published 17/5/2011To whom or what was Julia Gillard praying, since she tells us she has no god.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 59
- 60
- 61
-
- All
<<But please don't fiddle with its meaning in order to make inaccurate generalisations.>>
All too often, in my travels here on OLO, I come across theists adding more than is necessary to what it means to be an atheist - implying that it is a belief system in itself (as was implied in the article) - and I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s only ever done out of envy of those who are freethinkers not bound by a rigid dogma. They can’t stand it, so they need to drag those who disagree with them down to their own dogmatic level by re-defining atheism.
This is why I encourage all who aren’t religious to use the term to describe themselves rather than shying away with terms like “sceptic” or “agnostic”. Because if we don’t take ownership of the word, they’ll succeed is changing its meaning and we all know how bad they are at defining it.
What theists fail to realise, though, is that even if they do succeed in re-defining atheism, all it means is that we are no longer “atheists” and that we then need to select a different term to describe ourselves. Changing the definition of a word doesn’t change who people are. It just means they’ll use a different word to describe themselves in future.
The English language has enough illogical rules and exceptions for us to want to screw around with it any more than what already occurs naturally - just for our own little agendas.