The Forum > Article Comments > Are Christians really the source of Oz values? > Comments
Are Christians really the source of Oz values? : Comments
By Leslie Cannold, published 21/4/2011As the Ad Hoc Interfaith Committee explains, the main tolerance many Christians thought deserved legal protection was their
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Page 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
-
- All
Posted by McReal, Friday, 29 April 2011 6:59:08 AM
| |
mc quote/''Science isn't the mechanism for natural biology, oug, it is the explanation.""
it is a theory [as far as their THEORY of evolution is concerned] think is their theories are wrong sure with simple biological process..the can claim to know..bits but with evolution[ie changing genus where they calaim one genus 'evolved'..into new genus thats pure fraud] no one has ever evolved a wolf into a tiger or an ape into man.. [sure they speculate..but speculation..isnt science either] thing is they dont know cant replicte it[no replication no claim to science..'method' the dont have faulsification [ie cant even state definitive faulsifyable principles that if refuted rebuts their thesis] all science must have that or its not science but thats why its taught to kids gullible kids..as adults they think they know but when tested/pushed..reveal all they got is spin but im wasting valuable posting limits i was going to expand on values but its possably beyond others comprehending till they get they been sold lies.. by those who got no values for truth yes believing in a god sold by liars[religiously lying] and going against..'the science' seems a big jump but just because they are liars dont mean the cant stumle on same truths [the best/biggest lie needs to be mostly truth..or it fools no-one] but the ignorant of science think they are sooo clever saying i [me]..dont get the science.. trouble being i know what science is trying to say..and they lie so i need others to put up what they think they know so i can prove to them they been decieved but they hate to appear dumb [but they arnt..] the dumb stay silent thus 'they' remain dumb the wise dont mind asking questions [its the dumb who try to answer][to wit me] im only asking others to dare to ask for proof or present it or ask me to rebut or rebut what i say Posted by one under god, Friday, 29 April 2011 11:07:21 AM
| |
yes believing in a god
sold by liarsyes believing in a god sold by liars[religiously lying] and going against..'the science' seems a big jump and going against..'the science' seems a big jump... OUG...Your confusing me here. So your not with Evolution as you have written above....nor are you "Quote yes believing in a god sold by liars[religiously lying]".and you call yourself ONE UNDER GOD..so you present yourself as a believer of some other type of god..OK, got that much...So could you please tell me which God you believe that made it all? So neither left or right on this subject......I get that......so you must exist somewhere in the middles grounds.......and can you please explain exactly where that is......cause the God your saying right, is the one you believe in.......What is its name, if it has one? And No-more of your lengthy contradictory mumbo jumbo. I will settle for I dont know either way or Iam just a commentator. LEA Posted by Quantumleap, Friday, 29 April 2011 2:28:23 PM
| |
It is very probable that a healthy sense of self without reliance on belief in a deity/religion disseminates the highest and best values in a society.
"In 2005, the Kripke Center released a detailed study called, “Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies.” Long title, I know. But, what it said was very important and gets overlooked by many atheists. Keep in mind, the Kripke Center ISN’T secular and has no reason to promote a secular view. According to their own website, “The Kripke Center is dedicated to facilitating scholarly activity in the areas of religion and society. Special attention is given to promoting understanding between and among faith communities, including especially Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The Kripke Center’s primary audience is the academic community, but its scholarship and services are available to all who seek them. The Center is named in honor of Rabbi Myer and Dorothy Kripke.” The study had some amazing discoveries. They concluded: Indeed, the data examined in this study demonstrates that only the more secular, pro-evolution democracies have, for the first time in history, come closest to achieving practical “cultures of life” that feature low rates of lethal crime, juvenile-adult mortality, sex related dysfunction, and even abortion. The least theistic secular developed democracies such as Japan, France, and Scandinavia have been most successful in these regards. The non-religious, pro-evolution democracies contradict the dictum that a society cannot enjoy good conditions unless most citizens ardently believe in a moral creator. The widely held fear that a Godless citizenry must experience societal disaster is therefore refuted. Contradicting these conclusions requires demonstrating a positive link between theism and societal conditions in the first world with a similarly large body of data – a doubtful possibility in view of the observable trends." For the full report check out the link below: http://tinyurl.com/37j7pom Posted by Ammonite, Friday, 29 April 2011 2:29:51 PM
| |
OUG. I find this just for you. Can you please comment on it.
Oh and please read the YouTube comments below the link. Thank you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCpT88Jw-f4&feature=related Peace:) LEA Posted by Quantumleap, Friday, 29 April 2011 5:28:52 PM
| |
quote/leap
''tell me which God you believe that made it all?"" as i said..god made the universe sustains all life etc he made the earth we modified it...killed off much of it made the polution etc god just made life and sustains it to be as to which 'god'..there is but one god im told he calls himself 'me' or even i..[as in ..'i am'] others call him[her]..by many names but he is beyond name [and beyond lable like male/fee-mail] some think to have/know his name that they control him..[its such a joke] ''you must exist..in the middles grounds"" so do you my brother this realm lies between heaven and hell i like you lie in the middle..'ground' im in the middle about most aspects of this life i love respect and honour all the messengers. .but hold none before my good..god ''please explain exactly..where that is'' i ove [try to love gods creation as i know god does love all his creation [as you know i often fail..at consistantly loving all of you] but hey im not god..only god is ALLWAYS good im allowed to be wrong cause human error cant hurt spirit ""What is its name'' i call the femail part aspect..of good ana [alpha/negative alpha] the male asspect of good i call 'i am' but mostly i just think of him as good ""lengthy contradictory mumbo jumbo."" pot klettle my beloved brrr-other.. ''I will settle for I dont know"" i cant do that if i feel i know..i put it out-there and if others think im wrong..im only too ready to listen im not just posting commentary im posting what i feel fits as a reasonded out answer i really spent my life reading stuff everything is half right and half wrong and if im wrong or right..dont matter to me *as much as knowing the truth god is love/logic/life/light/thought..[energy] where his 'signs..[see previous line]..are.. there god must be thats good enough for me that we do to/for the least..we do to him [by the..love of neighbour is the how..of how..we love god] Posted by one under god, Friday, 29 April 2011 5:39:14 PM
|
as clever as it seems to be
can only insert genes [chromosones]..into living cells
" *it cant make a membrane..
[all cells need them]
"it..[ a chromosone]..cant make life..
it needs other things[20 minimum]
to sustain life..sustain the dna..create rna
rebuilt dna..feed sustain the cell walls etc"
@ OneUnerGod
Science isn't the mechanism for natural biology, oug, it is the explanation.
Science may be the mechanism for artificial things like engines, and rockets, but not basic biology.