The Forum > Article Comments > Are Christians really the source of Oz values? > Comments
Are Christians really the source of Oz values? : Comments
By Leslie Cannold, published 21/4/2011As the Ad Hoc Interfaith Committee explains, the main tolerance many Christians thought deserved legal protection was their
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Page 25
- 26
- 27
-
- All
Posted by Quantumleap, Friday, 29 April 2011 6:31:11 PM
| |
i would love to be able to visit youtube links
but my server simply refuses to acces youtube* from what i can make out from reading the tab its about the origen of species.. but i can only acces as far as that thus of course i cant watch/let alone comment...there but please name what they say was the first life or the origen of life..i have rebutted so many of them had too many comments..and lengthy debates deleted..when they lost i recall debating with dorkins.. re his flat fish theory he claims ..they 'evolved'..because their eyes dragged in the mud]..lol ..[yet the fry..[young]..flatfish arnt flat.. ..indeed look like any other fish thats when he got rid of..all the posts i posted they simply pretend it never happend but mate please post a summery here..! not being able to acces you tube is a pain a fool left a comment on my vidio PlexusMusic has made a comment on about the unseen cause.. logus love harmonics resonating light/love via logic into life..: he said..""What a load of crappp[edited]. And another minute of my life fu4c3d..[edited]..up."" i been trying to reply;.. :your life is the sum total of the moments..*you chose if all your choices were bad then you really had..*a bad life but remember that..*it was your choice ps.. [im sure the clip ran longer than a minute] i did it when grayham banned me for a month just trying out..a different 'way'..to exchange opinions but it just wasted my download limits and half an hour downloading pictures/editing publishing uploading it took much longer.. but this was on my old acces provider Posted by one under god, Saturday, 30 April 2011 1:06:49 AM
| |
".... we should be asking how tolerant is a minority lobby determined to redefine an institution for its own political agenda, when the institution has so much deep cultural, and in many cases religious, significance for so many."
Posted by Jim Wallace, Australian Christian Lobby, Thursday, 21 April 2011 12:06:27 PM So prophetic, Jim, Given your ANZAC day tweet and tangental addressing of your intent. Posted by McReal, Saturday, 30 April 2011 3:40:02 PM
| |
i noted..in watching a wedding recently
the future pope of great briton..was wearing an army uniform* for me that summed up,,the war like footing.. that has highjacked xtianity clearly as revealed in previous posts..these lands are ruled under the articles of war..thus the values of war as witnessed by the near genocide and..internment in camps their decendants still live on..to this day lest we forget the lost/generations or the stolen/wages or the high imprisonment of the natives let alone the deaths in custody [numericly high but reflective..of suicides in prisons generally..] only their high percentage..[disproportuinatly/representive].. imprisoned mainly because the legal service facilitates their incarceration..so as to steal their kids.. and remove the father..from the family unit yes true xtian/values indeed the sooner we end this deviated xtian values/style of xtian values..[insanity]..[lol..value]..the better today the door knocking xtian sect..visited telling me of how..the lord is comming let me quote from the text[called] 'what is gods kingdom'...[personally i feel revelations covers that..[he is enthroned in our hearts..or not] ..and emanuel [god within us all] but back to their quote ""gods kingdom..which is a real govt.. will soon bring..an end to all wickedness"" i told them jesus didnt judge no-one who is there to judge sin or sinner certainly not the christ..[recall the non-stoning?] he served even the least..his own cloak..etc he LIVED for loving nerighbour not casting guilt upon perceieved..self adjudged/sin regardless..lets quote some more ''kingdom..governed by king [the reserction of christ?]'' thing is jesus isnt dead he appeared before his followers..[read the book] to prove there is no spiritual death.. [and no reserction day/no judgment day] ''vision/prophet daniel' now a prophet as such recieves comunication from heaven why arnt xtians doing this today...? why?..[read on] ''daniel..i kept on beholding the vision'' get it... 'a vision..of the 'night'.. now heaven is in the light no night ever.. heaven is perpetual..'day'[light] but read on ''see there!.. ..a son of man'' to wit..not god [jesus born of woman demon-strated what all men..will do in time.. to wit survive...'death' heal sin..love neighbour.. love good] but read on [jesus?]..""happend to be comming;.. and..."" continues Posted by one under god, Saturday, 30 April 2011 5:38:26 PM
| |
""..to the ancient..*of days'"
[ie to god] .."'he gained acces*'' .."'and they?...bought him up close.. even before that one..[ie god]'' now 'they'..may be angels [following his 'death'..@..passover] or they could be us [now us putting him before god contradicts the first law...having none [NO ONE}..before god] andf so many xtians simply cant swallow him not* being god but back to the quote ""and to him''..[ie this son of men] ''there were given rulership...and dignity...and kingdom'' so we wake up pick a human and pretend jesus has come WHY? ''that the peoples national groups and languages..should ALL SERVE..even him"" ie the prince of peace/love grace mercy..etc now the thing is...god serves even the least to live jesus[or this son of man].. [prince of peace..anti/christ..whatever] would need to do the same god does [ie serve his living creation not be served by it] [this is where we are getting jesus teaching WRONG] he did as he saw our father do xtians MUST SERVE AS THE CHRIST SERVED not be served we get as we de-serve[by serving peace wrong] ie end your darn war! but back to the quote ""his rulership is imdefinatly lasting' not perpetual..nor eternal..not forever but indefinatly.. ie..[at the whim of those he serves with peace...dignity/kingdom..and just fair equal...unbiased..true..rulership this..''..indefinite rulership that will not passaway'' is clearly the good of god channeled down to earth..from heaven by means the church forbids.. [cause it cant tell that good from god from that of the demions of the night.. but kids sure can know good from ill.. [to wit that good from christ..from the vile of demons] and this is why ''his rulers ship is an indefinatly lasting..[value]... that will not pass away'' [because we the people help tell good from ill by voting out the world govt who gets it wrong... immediatly its proven wrong] ''and his kingdomis the one that will NOT BE BOUGHT TO RUIN*' dan 7;13/14 well thats what i got so far Posted by one under god, Saturday, 30 April 2011 5:39:17 PM
| |
its funny leap
how you said...''Mankind is futuristic,'' as i went to sleep last night.. [the night the future pope...of the common wealth wed a comminer] there was on the bbc a guy..[phycotrist]..talking about two people [patients...by intials one[ep]...lived only in the moment..[had no memory] and was much like a zen monk...but quite disfunctional.. cause he couldnt..imagine tomorrow..nor recall yesterday... the other [s..?]..rememberd everything but couldnt discriminate that usefull.. from that totally useless he could rabbit out everything he had paid attention to..but couldnt tell good from bad so both these states are not good i feel thats much like todays values law judges by past judgments..not..wether it was fair and cops live in the moment policing things..they judge in the moment irregardless of wether the law id fair or indeed legally unlawfull ok xtains shouldnt judge.. it dont matter a hoot what was the reality yesterday our living god lives..*in real time.. lives inside us all..*right now* so saying though i note the pope in a box [well 3 boxes really] [i understand porn is only double wrapped] but see its the same thing as that toughening up thing the army does only this xtian version..is called can-anon-isation.. [not the armed forces..;bar-SS-teurd-isation] that comes 'from' hell for sure anything with the word cannon in it..must be suss unrelated i wrote this learning for the pope in boxes 3 wwho may or may not be in that dark place where many of the middle ages popes dwell [recall the inquisition.. ;..direct from hell] anyhow what if you were in a dark place,..say in a box what difference to you..where that box is how could you learn or care to learn the colour of the box from within..its too dark to tell a black thread from a white thread and the outside well who cares how would you know the box waas even the 'right-way' up or the right branded lable...or indeed even if it were a box anyhow posting limit...lol will finish the story at the anzac thread... http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4432&page=0 Posted by one under god, Sunday, 1 May 2011 8:11:44 AM
|
" there god must be
thats good enough for me
that we do to/for the least..we do to him"
That! OUG.....I understand. That middle/natural/neutral ground sure is quite a comfortable place to exist in, and Iam sure there's more of you, with just that type of feelings towards life. However, not all see it as we are, ( Mankind is futuristic, but caving and both of us will be forever profoundly different in our definitions of what the origins of life are, and I hope you find yours, with peace in your heart from your readings of/Him/Her and not the controlling evil one,s, who wish to suppress all in the name of what evolved in us. You know, the one's that's miles away from any reliability of truth, that most take for granted. ( thats freedom to be free )...OUG... It is indeed...A FUNNY OLD WORLD.
All the best
QL