The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Victoria, religious freedom and those that don't get it > Comments

Victoria, religious freedom and those that don't get it : Comments

By Danny Stevens, published 18/2/2011

Oppressing employees religious freedom is not an act of religious freedom.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 11
  11. 12
  12. 13
  13. All
History will judge you, members of the Victorian government and the Australian Christian Lobby, in the same way it judges the Inquisitors.
Posted by Neil of Ipswich, Saturday, 19 February 2011 1:23:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Neil of Ipswich writes
'History will judge you, members of the Victorian government and the Australian Christian Lobby, in the same way it judges the Inquisitors.'

You are wrong Neil. History is interpreted and re interpreted by all sides for political reasons. It will be our Creator that judges us unless of course we receive His pardon.
Posted by runner, Saturday, 19 February 2011 1:30:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
[Deleted for abuse.]
Posted by Tim Anderson, Saturday, 19 February 2011 1:37:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Tim Anderson

I suggest you argue with the many scientist who disagree with you. They are a growing number who don't swallow 'consensus' science because it is not science unless both sides are thoroughly investigated.
Posted by runner, Saturday, 19 February 2011 1:44:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
continued.....

EVOLUTION= RACISM.

From that..we arrive at the next train station "Eugenics"..after all..if we are the product of 'natural selection' then..why not help it along a bit? afterall..God doesn't exist.. what's to stop us?

annnnnd of course we know who ran with that idea...

1/ FABIAN SOCIALISTS
2/ ADOLPH HITLER.
3/ GREENS? yet to be seens but looks like they are heading in that direction.

//Evolution is a scientific theory that has been proved over and over again by genetics and archeology// yep indeedy.... racism from the Greens and Socialists is rampant, and attributable to ... "Evolution"

Now Tim.. you also claimed (spuriously) that...

//Evolution explains the diversity and distribution of life on earth, the Bible does not.//

I suggest that the Bible ABSOLUTELY explains both diversity and distribution. Read Genesis 1-3 for origins and Gen 10 for the distribution of mankind. Clear as a bell. *ding*

BIBLE=ONE ancestor (thus all are equal)
GENETICS=ONE ancestor (thus, all are equal)

The problem and conflict is....?

Now.. re you not being careful about how you describe our faith.. 2nd warning. Don't mock or vilify it/us. Argue and disagree..by all means.. mock and ridicule? nope..illegal. Section 8 RRT2001

RACHE..I call em as I see em and world wide, progressives and Greens HATE Christians and Christianity.. the evidence is clear, unmistakable and on the record!

BUGSY..
"favored races"...."prefered races"... difference ?

I'm so glad when you read the scriptures..and more glad when you quote them here. I hope all read them.
Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Saturday, 19 February 2011 1:44:45 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Tim Anderson your insistence on personal insults adds no credabilty to your arguement.

You write
'are so vain arrogant and ignorant, what rubbish will children lean in your preferred school.'

I have a son who was homeschooled for a number of years. He read widely. Having to go into the State system (due to no other choices) to get entrance to uni his secular science teacher called him 'brilliant'. I don't agree with that assessment however having someone willing to question the dogma of what he was being taught must of been refreshing to the teacher. He is now excelling in sciences at uni. My other homeschooled child is just finishing honors at university (having to ignore the dogma being taught to her).

Your assertion is both arrogant and incorrect.
Posted by runner, Saturday, 19 February 2011 1:59:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 11
  11. 12
  12. 13
  13. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy