Poison Ivy, what ever the triggering event was, Poison Ivy the girl at the centre of the St Kilda football scandal is out of control.

Whether Nixon had inappropriate relationship with her or not, the cries to burn him at the cross, misses entirely her role in deliberately setting him up.

So far she has published photos, and set-up a senior person. Even if she manages to destroy the total AFL club, it still will not be enough for her.

So she had a relationship with a player, got access to his computer down loaded some pictures and published them on the net.

She secretly video recorded Nixon in his underwear and released that to the media.

It is claimed that at 17 she is not old enough to be responsible for her own decisions.

http://angryharry.com/rethirtydays.htm
<Investigators concluded Shong faked Internet chat sessions -- essentially chatting with herself -- purportedly talking to Fry about their sexual contact.

"Everybody in the court system who has looked at this case agrees it's unprecedented the lengths she went to to fabricate evidence," said Stuart Dunnings III, Ingham County prosecuting attorney.>

Poison Ivy is toxic to any male who has anything to do with her, and Poison Ivy will be the poster girl for feminists to enforce stronger laws or to invent new ones, in an attempt to protect Poison Ivy and girls/women like her from being responsible for their consequences of their own behaviour and actions.

Dougthebear,

I am aware of a case in the nineties, where the court did in fact rule that the marriage was invalid.

Non-consummation was the principal grounds.

Perhaps the slighted partner needs to actually apply?

Maybe the rules have changed but that might not sit well with people who made their commitment uinder other rules and expect consideration under those rules.

Rusty

Rose C., how would you describe yourself?
"I'm just an average, everyday 49-year-old."

How do you view others here on the OLO Forum?

"I've had a good look at various posts lately and it seems most posters are wowsers, rabble-rousers, religious reactionaries and there's even a rather odd poet in there for good measure. Whether this sampling of humanity is a reflective microchosm, or merely the rantings of a bunch of self indulgent blow-hards with two much time on their hands, is anyone's guess. It seems that this site attracts person's who hold extreme views - like moths to a flame." 
Rose C, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 11:30:36 AM

So why do you think this bunch of oddballs come here? And are you any different?

"I'm just an average, everyday 49-year-old mother-of-three who is fed up to the back teeth with not seeing her kind being realistically represented via the electronic or print media. I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore." - Rose C. 29/12/10
 
Yes, Rose, me too.

http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=13955

<By Jean Cloons – The Sovereign Independent

I'm a Feminist, Now what?

Dad what is feminism?

Oh That! Well! A bunch of half-women-half-men that like dressing-up clothes started it. They like the feel of woolly aprons and robes on their skin, that’s all. They hide from public view in lodges, but they’d skin your hide and tassel at the drop of a fez. They like brooches and badges. Regalia they call it. The half-women-half-men recruited half-men-half-women in order to turn all future gene-rations into a soup of half-men-half-women-half-women-half-men. They launched an all-out attack on normality through fiction, drama, music, comedy, novels, soaps, work, education etc, in fact all of the new normal society was gene-rated by them in this way. Feminism they call it.

Dad, that’s not true, feminism is about equal pay and opportunities for women.>

Read the rest.

Dan is not 49 years old, not a mother of anybody.

He is male christian who believes in "creationism".

Views he supports have enjoyed a pervasive hold upon our entire society for centuries. The increased understanding and potential control we have over our condition and circumstances have occurred in lockstep with the retreat of the religious views Dan supports.
Such views still enjoy disproportionate influence upon our society, enjoying virtually dissent-free dissemination from the pulpit, funded by tax-exempt donations not available to other forms of entertainment.

So, no. It is not a case of "me too rose, me too"

It is more a case of whinging, and hoping to get the snout in further, anytime anywhere.

Rusty

JamesH,
St Kilda Football Club and the AFL are in the news now again for the wrong reasons. But this is nothing compared to the media frenzy that is coming later this year with the rape trial of Andrew Lovett.

We know that St Kilda drew last year’s final 68-68, and were only one breath away from winning the flag for which their supporters have been waiting for decades. And they did this without their prize recruit, Lovett, running through the midfield for the entire year, after having delisted him after his rape charge following his night out with his teammates.

It will be front and back page news. Consent and intoxication will again be in focus.

Rusty,
This is a forum/discussion/debate website, where people share different views. If you don’t believe that I, along with all others here, am entitled to my considered opinion, or can’t handle someone disagreeing with you, then I think you’ve come to the wrong place, mate.