<It is not and has never been a feminist plot. Numbnuts.>

<You are so judgemental and ignorant you took my previous posts to you seriously, heard you fall in my moron pit way down here in Victoria.

Or do I start another piece of satire?>
Posted by Severin, Saturday, 18 September 2010 10:41:27 AM

Never a feminist plot? Well Hoff-Sommers, Wendy McElroy, Melaine Phillips, Christine Stobla, Erin Pizzey disagree with you.

On the other hand perhaps certain dysfuntional female personality types may be using feminism as a cover to serve their own personal agenda against males.

http://web.archive.org/web/20050306012220/http://www.nojustice.info/Courts/TheBestInterestoftheMother.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20050309230433/www.nojustice.info/Courts/childsupport.htm

Good afternoon to all of you, and 'We are unique','Suzeonline' and 'Formersnag'...

Firstly, I must apologise unreservedly if by capitalising your pseudonyms herein, has offended or aggrieved anyone who contributes material on OLO. It's certainly not my intention to cause any acrimony or enmity in this place. Gosh, there's enough negativity all 'round us without my (unintentioned) contribution adding to it.

I note 'Formersnag', you state, statistically 90% of marriage breakdowns are precipitated by women ? Actually, I don't know, so I'll certainly take your word for it.

Nevertheless, assuming the above stats. are correct. It doesn't necessarily follow, that the woman is to blame. In any case, it is NOT the job of police to determine blame. That (difficult) duty falls clearly within the aegis of the Family Court.

Essentially, the (only) role of police, in Family Law matters are:

(a) In matters of Domestic Violence - the protection of life and property and, preservation of the Queen's Peace (an old-fashioned and whimsical term, but still very current).

(b) When necessary, enforce ALL judgements, orders, conditions, and requirements of the Family Court.

And, basically that's it. Of course, should a crime emerge, as a consequence of any Family law issue/s, then it becomes the normal responsibility of police to prosecute the author of that crime.

Thank you 'We are unique' for your support, I really appreciate it.

Again, I'm sorry for any exasperation I may have occasioned to any contributer to OLO, it was not my intention to do so.

Cheers...Sung Wu.

Pelican,
You will find the statistics regards shared parenting have hardly changed in 5 years. There appears to be some that believe that shared parenting is now the norm, but it is not, and the problem of fatherless children has not decreased.

For example: -

“THE shared parenting law introduced by the Howard government has resulted in more children spending time with both parents after divorce, but the numbers who do so are minuscule and most children still spend the majority of time with their mothers.”

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/shared-parenting-law-brings-little-change/story-e6frg6nf-1225826082938

"how do you think society should be structured"?

I would think there should be less demonizing of men and fathers. The father who threw the child off the bridge is one case that is repeated over and over and over, but have you ever thought of the number of fathers looking after their children every second weekend and ½ the school holidays (now 100,000’s) and there is not any reported problems.

Repeating the case of the child being thrown off the bridge is a part of the process of demonising fathers.

The issue of the fraudulent claims made by the Office of Women in SA is another example of the demonisation of men.

The fact that few can seem to find an academic in a university who has ever written anything positive about fathers is another part of the demonisation of fathers.

The vilification of men rights groups by university academics is another part of the demonisation process.

The lack of positive comments from university academics about men in general is also a part of the demonisation of men.

Etc, etc, etc

Now that the Office of Women is out of the way, the next on the list should be those in universities who seek to denigrate men and fathers, and who should also be on the list are the vice-chancellors who have employed such people.

I read the story about the Dad missing his child after just 3plus years. I emigraited from the UK to Oz in 1989. Biggest mistake of my life! My ex, a community health nurse, abducted my 2 daughters twice in 1999 from Whyalla South Australia. I haven't seen either (youngest) since march 2000, mainly because of Oz secrecy laws. I got them back the first time but not the second, despite 9 applications to the Family Court in Adelaide in Jan 2000. Nothing was done. The Mother managed to get the girls enrolled in Adelaide schools in contravention of the Family Court Order residency provision which the schools chose to ignore, and which Ombudsman Biganovsky would later describe as "not lawful". Fathers are not permitted to participate in Family Court of Australia trial proceedings, ( I have had 2), so I got wiped out financially including the seizure of an award for post traumatic stress injuries sustained some years prior to my marriage during an armed robbery in Lagos Nigeria. So no opportunity to challenge. Because of the Mothers status she has been able to intercept my eldest daughters complaints of abuse, meaning that the Mother and her partner are above the law.
The South Australia police are worse than useless. I have no faith in the integrity of any Aussie Agency except for the ABC

Ken's real life story is similar to mine. I have not seen my children since December. All I did was to report my children's abuse to DHS, and the message was quickly passed onto my ex and her social workers.

I wrote to OCS, Chief Justice of Family court, but to no avail. Finally I decided not to return the children as they were scared to return as my daughter was inappropriately touched by a unqualified male from Connections, the ex's family support group.

My daughter gave evidence to Police but nothing happended. DHS version was, "father's time needs to be supervised".

my ex's allegations of violence and abuse were thrown out by court at an IVO hearing and she continued to abuse the children. Who is really listening? the answer is 'No one'. It is very true that the system is operated and run by feminist.

My heart goes to all fatherless children and I hope the system changes for good of the children and liars are charged for perjury.

Thank you

Who is Ken?