http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=10994#183080

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=10994#183085

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=10994#183086

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=10994#183087

Excellent work gentlemen, the kind of research that warwick quoted in his article has been around for about 3 decades now. Carefully done peer reviewed research by internationally reknowned academemics.

Yet still the radical, extreme, loony, left, lesbian, Fe"Man"Nazi Paedophiles insist upon "grooming" children for abuse and neglect.

Several hundred years ago when the UK really did have a patriarchal society, its purpose was to protect children from their "deadbeat" mothers and to protect women from themselves.

Every mother who is not living in a happy, harmonious marriage with the biological father of her children is neglecting or abusing them in some way, shape or form. This is a well documented scientifically proven fact.

If he is not neglecting or abusing his wife or his children? And 99% of biological fathers are NOT. Then just because she is going through a self imposed "Mid Life Crisis" and is too lazy or stupid to do some counselling so she can grow up and get over herself? Why should the children be psycologically tortured?

Formersnag

Thank you so much for your thoughtful comments regarding mothers. I have just one question to which I do hope you will apply your considerable intellect:

Do widows abuse children as well?

As you are so well informed about women and their parenting skills I am sure you will be able to answer this question honestly and without recourse to vilifying women in general.

Fond Regards

I see that statistics about fatherlessness are quoted. Did it ever occur to anyone at all that maybe the males who lived without a father were also living in poverty? Typically those who live in poverty do not reside in mansions in Beverly Hills. They live in the Bronx or in the ghettos of LA. They live in small houses and mothers struggle to find the next meal for the children. They do not have everything they need for growing up. Other children get the cool gadgets and toys and clothes while they wear hand me downs and thrift store reruns. This causes anxiety in many children especially teenagers. This anger could and does cause children to turn to a life of crime in order to get money to have the things that their friends have.

Maybe if a mother is given the resources she needs in order to provide a good life for her children without the struggle, there would not be so many boys turning to a life of crime in order to obtain possessions. Maybe if allegations of abuse were not routinely ignored, these boys would not be so angry as to turn to a life of crime.

Abusevictum,

"given the resources"

This is the same old thing. The mothers are not being given enough money, but who has the money to give them.

Most people have enough difficulty paying their mortgage, paying for their own children, and saving for their retirement, without having to pay for someone else’s children.

The philosophy of feminism was based on a Marxist philosophy that the father is removed from the children, and then the children are raised by the mother and the state.

This was agreed with by academic feminists such as Germaine Greer, who few people would ever want near their children.

The ultimate situation is that the state can’t afford to pay for all those children being raised under the Marxist/ feminist philosophy.

Dear Vanna

You are so wise, could you please point out where it is written in the Marxist/Feminist manifesto that fathers should be removed from their children? It is dreadful news indeed. Breaks my heart to hear of it.

I am very concerned because most mothers and fathers appear to be very good people, doing the best they can - clearly evil feminists are hiding their vile natures from all of us.

I dread to think of the numbers of women who are secretly evil, evil Marxists just waiting to remove children from their caring, wonderful, fair, strong and manly fathers - how will the little ones gain a balanced perspective without their dads? Especially as it means the dear children will be poorer, because instead of two incomes they'll be surviving on a combination of whatever job or Centrelink benefit the evil feminist mother rakes in and whatever the poor father is forced by the evil, evil CSA to pay.

Severin,
To give you a quick history lesson.

Many feminists might think themselves somehow modern when saying words such as “patriarchal” and “oppression”, but these words can be found sprinkled throughout documents such as the communist manifesto produced in 1848.

Marxism was very hip in the 1970’s, together with free love, lots of drugs, and the breaking down of the establishment.

A number of the heroines of feminism came into prominence during this time, such as Betty Friedman.

"Professor Horowitz documents that Friedan was from her college days, and until her mid-30s, a Stalinist Marxist, the political intimate of the leaders of America's Cold War fifth column and for a time even the lover of a young Communist physicist working on atomic bomb projects in Berkeley's radiation lab with J. Robert Oppenheimer. Her famous description of America's suburban family household as "a comfortable concentration camp" in "The Feminine Mystique" therefore had more to do with her Marxist hatred for America than with any of her actual experience as a housewife or mother.

Under the Marxist / feminist system, the family unit was called the “bourgeois family”, and was regarded as a part of the establishment that had to be destroyed.

Marxism believes that the state should control all, and wanted to abolish the family, with children mainly being raised by the state, for the state, with some influence from the mother, and none by the father.

And so it has to come pass, that so many women have been, and still are, being indoctrinated into believing that they can raise children by themselves with money from the state, (or from the taxpayer), and the children do not need a father.

These women have simply been a brainwashed pawn of Marxist/feminists who came to prominence during the 1970’s, but now, most people would not allow their children anywhere near.