The Blue Cross

'It would be interesting to hear from Runner on the article and audio.'

Put it this way TBC I guarantee that representatives of Scripture in School would have a far healthier message than the likes of secular ethicist like Singer who in the past has condoned pedophile and bestiality. You take your pick!

Dear Mikk,
If they would only teach mathematics and literature in the light of the truth instead of duming down children with negative nonsence which does nothing to develop an inquiring mind. Any person half way intelligent can disprove the 1,000,000,000 year theory by asking where are all the people for if you take 2 people and double it every generation it only takes 32.35 generations to reach the present population of the world which anybody with a mind not set in concrete could see. I see you as the gullible one for I have an inquiring mind thanks to my aunt who encouraged us to read. The bible is the most historicaly accurate book in exsitance today and braver men then you have tried to disprove it so don't waste my time and yours.

Dear runner,

You have to know where to look. The Bible isn’t as uptight about sex as some of the Bible bashers:

The Bible advocates French kissing.

Song of Solomon 7:9 And the roof of thy mouth like the best wine for my beloved, that goeth down sweetly, causing the lips of those that are asleep to speak.

The Bible advocates foreplay.

Isaiah 5:1 Now will I sing to my wellbeloved a song of my beloved touching his vineyard. My wellbeloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill:

The Bible advocates foreplay with clitoral stimulation.

Song of Solomon 2:6 His left hand is under my head, and his right hand doth embrace me.

Song of Solomon 5:4 My beloved put in his hand by the hole of the door, and my bowels were moved for him.

The Bible even eulogises homosexual love:

Samuel 2 1:26 I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.

You have skipped the good parts.

@ The Blue Cross, (re Wednesday, 16 June 2010 2:33:04 PM)

The predatory attitude in that article is ... interesting(?).

@ pelican - I agree - ""It is cruel IMO to teach children that humans are nothing more than sinners without any redeeming features unless we seek forgiveness from a supernatural being of which no-one has yet provided any evidence".

runner, as I said Tuesday, 15 June 2010 9:16:24 PM - ""Peter Singer is a philosopher and so contemplates, publicly ...

e.g. ... http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/2001----.htm

"A discussion does not equal condoning, or deserve stoning, either.""

Your persistent references to bestiality are perverted. As are the incestuous relations between Lot and his daughters, described in Genesis 19.

Aha... Runner is too scared to offer a comment.

If he agrees that school camps are ripe for proselytising he admits that is what SRE-chaplains are all about.

If he denies it, he knows His Lord will know that he is fibbing and he will go straight to Hell, without $200, and no get out of Hell free card either.

Instead, he pretends that Singer is about to enter schools and displace Longstaff and his very mild ethics trial.

The dishonesty of these SRE people and their supporters is just amazing, staggering in fact, considering they are demanding a 'right' to go in and meddle with our children.

One of the roles, so I imagine anyway, that Singer has adopted is to pose questions for debate.

How dangerous is that?

I have never heard him advocating people do have sex with animals, only asking questions about it.

(BTW, we had a local dairy farmer some years back arrested for having sex with his cow... a good believer he was too).

The Runners of the world never want to debate anything, only impose, coerce and bully.

Like the SRE fellow who sees a chance to impose on unwary students.

How utterly contemptible!

TBC

'Aha... Runner is too scared to offer a comment.' You are totally wrong again.

The champion of free speech as long as its not truth telling.