The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Why can't a woman's s*xuality be more like a man's? > Comments

Why can't a woman's s*xuality be more like a man's? : Comments

By Leslie Cannold, published 10/6/2010

Is low libido in women pathological or just evidence that female s*xuality is different to men's? And is a pill the answer?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 31
  11. 32
  12. 33
  13. All
Dougthebear, calm down, I was giving a slanted view for the irony factor of men once again directing women to do what suits men best.....I thought the tone was obvious, with the he created women and all that...sorry.
Posted by sonofgloin, Saturday, 12 June 2010 12:30:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dougthebear, I don't think anyone has asked for a 'calm sexually down' pill for the average man!

The only time I have ever known of Doctors giving men hormone pills to decrease their sexual drive is when they are convicted rapists or paedophiles.
These pills are thus already available for oversexed men if need be.

Women are not programmed like men because their pregnancies take up to nine months to produce babies.
Once they reach menopause, they also naturally reduce their need for sex. Older men slow down too, but can still impregnate women.

Nature does not need women to be constantly sexually available because of these facts.

Men, on the other hand, needed to be ready for all prospects because back in the cave man days, many women died in childbirth, so it was up to the men to keep as many women of the tribe pregnant as possible, to ensure the survival of that tribe.

These basic sexual feelings remain in both men and women, but our brains have evolved since then (supposedly!).
So men are supposed to be more choosy now, and have no need to impregnate multiple women to ensure the survival of their tribe.

So all those men who are out there having unprotected sex with any willing women are basically still chest-beating cave-men :)

Yeah alright, you guys can start screaming at me now...
Posted by suzeonline, Saturday, 12 June 2010 1:41:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Suzeonline:

>> So all those men who are out there having unprotected sex with any willing women are basically still chest-beating cave-men :) <<

ROFL

And then they complain about having to pay child support.

Apologies, couldn't resist.
Posted by Severin, Saturday, 12 June 2010 10:24:19 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Severin, suzeonline, there has been a major shift in the aggressive sexuality of the modern woman. Traditionally I have had to be aware of chicks wanting their evil way with me, and I have been careful not to send the wrong messages. Now I find along with the chicks, I have the cougars to contend with, womanhood has become a menacing menagerie. Personally the last thing I need is a souped up hormone to make the fems even more aggressive than they are now.
Just for the record, could you women please stop considering my worth in terms of the pleasure I can bring to you physically, I have a mind and feelings just like you, if you cut me do I not bleed, I am not a play thing put on this earth to satisfy you’re out of control hormones.

Please do not consider this a rebuke, I want the attention you chicks and cougars continually shower me with, but remember I could be your son, brother, or father, so let me wear a condom and be gentle with us guys.
Posted by sonofgloin, Saturday, 12 June 2010 11:13:05 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
sonofgloin

Tee hee

Maybe you should just keep your legs crossed, you sweet thing.
Posted by Severin, Saturday, 12 June 2010 11:21:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What an amazing tribute to feminism this article is.

Leslie Cannold is a spokesfeminist for one of the most disgusting medical procedures currently being carried out, which is IVF, or the artificial propagation of human life.

This procedure extensively uses drugs on women, and the majority of IVF procedures are now being carried out on single women, who so often complain that they can’t find a man who will “commit”. This basically hides the fact that they can’t find a man who actually likes them.

Then this feminist writes “Being desired exclusively seems to be key to female libido, which may explain why relationships initially arouse women but cease to do so as time goes on. Indeed, while men tend to find their partners more desirable over time, women often need a new partner to rekindle desire.“

This feminist inadvertently uncovers or exposes what is the main principle of feminism, which is to use men for their money and their sperm.

Well done feminist, but the sad part is, this principle is being taught in universities as a subject.

If someone wants their children to go to a university, but also wants them to develop any type of morality, heavily investigate what they are about to study and be taught in that university.
Posted by vanna, Saturday, 12 June 2010 4:02:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 31
  11. 32
  12. 33
  13. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy