The Forum > General Discussion > The Dangers of Christian Fundamentalism
The Dangers of Christian Fundamentalism
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Posted by Yuyutsu, Monday, 14 November 2022 9:55:47 AM
| |
As for "Hillsong?" I don't know that much about
them - except that they do have an emphasis on money - and that their leader Brian Houston , a friend of our previous PM Scott Morrisoan, stepped down in March 2022 amid allegations of sexual misconduct. Posted by Foxy, Monday, 14 November 2022 9:59:06 AM
| |
Hi Yuyutsu,
If you don't like the promotion of social cohesion - than there's not much more to discuss. Posted by Foxy, Monday, 14 November 2022 10:01:39 AM
| |
Dear Foxy,
"there's not much more to discuss" in the context of this thread, means that your sole concern regarding Christian fundamentalists is their ability to disrupt the Australian regime's march to enforce on us its idea of social cohesion. You do not seem to be concerned, like Paul and others, about the potential ability of Christian fundamentalists to also disrupt ordinary people's lives (I don't know whether or not they can, so I await Paul's reply). - Then have a nice day! Posted by Yuyutsu, Monday, 14 November 2022 2:59:27 PM
| |
An irrational belief can have devastating consequences, personally and within the wider community, here is an example; "The culprits (attack on Japanese subway with sarin gas) Aum Shinrikyo, were an obscure doomsday religious group who believed the end of the world was coming"
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35975069 Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 14 November 2022 3:22:07 PM
| |
Yuyutsu,
I can't take you seriously any more. Posted by Foxy, Monday, 14 November 2022 4:02:25 PM
|
«Read the link I gave. It may help this discussion.
It is on topic.
Here it is again for you:»
What makes you think that I have not read it?
How could I possibly criticise it, as I did, had I not read it?
Nor did I claim that the article was not on topic. It is indeed about the danger which Christian fundamentalism and others pose TO YOUR REGIME and since Paul did not specify in his opening address who/what is presumably in danger (he only mentioned "the world"), I agree that that article, hostile and misleading as it is, is somewhat on topic.
«There's much more on the given link.»
Indeed, much more and much that I do not like, including that promotion of "social cohesion".
---
Thank you Josephus, I liked your last comment.