Is Mise,

Diana was not the first to go astray. There was
a suspicion that she had an affair with her bodyguard
but it was not true and nothing physical happened.
Charles and Camilla had a long history and it did not
stop with his marriage to Diana. Charles was already
involved with Camilla prior to his wedding to Diana.

Also according to an audiotape Diana made for her
biographer Andrew Morton revealed that even after she
was married she confronted Camilla about her affair with
Charles at a party.

Diana stated, " I know what's going on between you and
Charles and I just want you to know that."

To which Camilla replied:
"You've go everything you ever wanted.
You've got all the men in the world fall in love with you
and you've got two beautiful children what more do you want."

Diana said - "I want my husband."

Diana added, "I'm sorry I;m in the way and it must be hell
for both of you. But I do know what's going on. Don't treat me
like an idiot."

In any case why do you apply one set of standards for the
monarch and another for our MPs? How do we know what is
really in the hearts of our MPs - and what the oath means to
them? And how many actually believe in the oath that they
are required to take. Or is it a means to an end for many of
them - and what they are hoping to achieve?

It does not
make them liars or perjurers. But in the case of King Charles -
and his wedding vows and oath before God - and as a leader
of his Church - that's a different story again.

Foxy
More cojecture and not a shred of evidence and it has nowt to do with MsP who perjure themselves to get into Parliament.

I do hope that you’re never on a jury considering evidence.

MPs having republican views is not evidence of perjury. They can remain allied to the King despite not wanting him to remain head of state, for the King has not commanded otherwise!

And I'm pretty sure the breaking of marriage vows doesn't count as perjury either, as they do not have the legal status of oaths. The sad fact is lots of people get divorced; I'm not a lawyer but I'm pretty sure that's not the basis of any perjury charges.

.

The awesome immensity of the worldwide public reaction to this historical event gives the impression that it’s not just Queen Elizabeth II who is about to be buried in the royal vault at Windsor Castle, but the British Monarchy itself that she so well personified that is being interred.

.

Is Mise,

How's that list going? Just the Feds will do. Are my two friends on your list. Mehreen and Dave from NSW?

Aidan,
Espousing republican views and then swearing allegiance to the King by politicians is indeed perjury as Lidia Thorpe demonstrated when she admitted to lying when she made the Affirmation

Herr Goebells,
The list is in Hansard, don’t be tiresome .,