Nope Paul

Twas rache who dreamed up ""mourn porn" right here http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=9913&page=0#338224

The sheer TV repetition of Queen docos, dramas and "new" news already aired in the 12 months before her Exit isn't helping we mourn-fatigued OLOers.

The more difficult challenge is analysing and predicting how Charlie will change the Monarchy and the likely impact on Australia. A hint, look at Charlie's record http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_III#Official_duties on down and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_III#Reign .

Mavers

Although Charles has the right old school tie, several in fact, and the correct plum in his mouth, and is of impeccable breeding no less, and is seen only in the best of circles. I SAY....! IS HE A WOLF IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING, A LOOSE CANNON! GOD FORBID.... A BOLSHI NO LESS!

What do others think, will Charlie turn out to be a red terror, or a member of the yellow peril. Will I wake one morning and find the crown has gone and Commissar Charleski is on the throne, or under my bed (Reds tend to hind under the beds).

Sorry Mavers, I didn't look it up, I just tagged it on you. I stand corrected, but I like it... "Mourn Porn". I must text my friend with a word of support.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_III#Official_duties

"In June 2022, The Times reported that Charles had privately described the UK Government's Rwanda asylum plan as "appalling" and feared that it would overshadow the June Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Rwanda, where Charles represented the Queen.

It was later reported that Cabinet Ministers had warned Charles to avoid making political comments, as they feared a constitutional crisis could arise if he continued to make such statements once he became king."

Steele,
The remarks in their entirety if you please and if you’ve got the guts.

Dear Is Mise,

For all your affront and pearl clutching about what this lass said your insistence that the words be reproduced here utterly reinforces your deep hypocrisy on this.

Well done.

Well for the purpose of open discussion her reported Intagram post which she subsequently removed within hours was:

“Today is a good f*ing day, uncle Luke announces his tour, and this dumb dog dies. Happy f*ing Friday.”

The reference link is: http://www.sportbible.com/rugby-league/indigenous-nrlw-star-under-fire-for-calling-the-queen-a-dumb-dog-20220913

As a citizen of the World Charles Windsor is entitled to speak out and express his opinion on any subject. Doing so, he will suffer the consequences and criticism from many quarters, but he might feel its more important to speak than remain silent.

Issy, as for what this footy gal said, she like you is entitled to express an opinion. The death of Elizabeth Windsor is an opportunity for some to level criticism, not so much at her personally, but is seen as an open attack on the Establishment, which for you old conservatives is "treason".

BTW; I see the list of Australians going to the funeral, it includes Ben Robert-Smith, a totally unsuitable person to represent Australia at anything.