"The sources you have used in the past have been questionable."

Question what you want. But I have never stooped to using an anonymous Amazon reviewer who wasn't even a verified purchaser to justify my desire to decision to ignore alternate views.

mhaze,

Deny all you want. The critic in question was a verified
purchaser he'd read the book and was offering an
alternative view none of which you simply refuse to
accept. He did go into detail about the material in the book.
Thus it is a case of - pot, kettle, black.
You have no credibility when you expect others to comply
by rules that you yourself don't follow.

In any case - if you and I are at loggerheads over these
issues - we both should be able to better understand why
there's not much hope for the Israel/Palestine conflict
being resolved any time soon.

Enjoy your day.

"The critic in question was a verified purchaser "

That's straight-up wrong. But you'll never understand it and why it matters.

That is just your opinion.

And you have no idea of what I do or don't understand
especially considering your past and current records
on this forum of getting not getting things right.

If a reviewer has purchased the book, Amazon attached a notice to their review saying they are a verified purchaser. Its not a statement of opinion, its a statement of fact. I'm sure that'll elude you.

Amazon is well-know for having reviewers give bad reviews to books they don't want people to read. Seems it works in many cases, or at least one - no names mind you.

Yes - . The same applies to the publishers whose reviews
of this particular book were only favourable.
We can read all sorts of things into why things happen
to suit our own views. But having some evidence would make
it more credible.