Foxy,
You reveal your shallow knowledge once again, the SCOTUS cannot change the Constitution,
suggest that you do a little research.

Is Mise,

How about you doing your own research?

As Steele told you - you have to make some effort to read
the links given and try to research the information.
If you can't - none of us can help you.

Here we go again:

http://supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx

http://nbcchicago.com/news/local/what-is-the-14th-amendment-and-how-is-it-connected-to-abortion-rights-roe-v-wade-2/2865134/

Is Mise,

If you think my knowledge is shallow - lets see evidence
of your knowledge - something of substance to back up
your claims - there's a good chap. Put your money where
your mouth is.

Foxy,
The US Constitution can only be changed by law, and the SCOTUS has followed the law, I read your links and the Justices of the Supreme Court agree with me Amendment 14 does not apply, they threw out the convoluted reasoning of their predecessors.
To repeat they did not change the Constitution and there never was a Constitutional right to abortion.
Note that the SCOTUS. is now much more diverse, having three women members.

Is Mise,

"In their scathing joint dissent, the Supreme Court's
liberal justices wrote:

"The majority has overturned Roe and Casey for one and only
one reason - because it has always despised them, and now
it has the votes to discard them. The majority thereby
substitutes a rule by judges for the rule of law."

This conservative majority would allow states to "ban abortion
from conception onward because it does not think forced childbirth
at all implicates a woman's rights to equality and freedom,"
said the dissent by Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayer, and Elena
Kagan.

"Today's Court, that is, does not think there is anything of
constitutional significance attached to a woman's control of her body
and the path of her life," it said.

"A state can force her to bring a pregnancy to full term, even
at the strongest personal and familial costs."

That's why the ongoing violence continues in the US.

You should know this because the following link was given
earlier - apparently you did not read or understand it:

http://cnbc.com/2022/06/24/roe-v-wade-overturned-by-supreme-court-ending-federal-abortion-rights.html

Oh, suddenly Foxy wants some context.

When discussing Charlottesville, Foxy treated context like it was poison. Absolutely no fine people on the side she opposed. Thousands of them and not a single fine person. That was Foxy's 'context'.

But mention just a few of the Obamessiah's violent remarks, and suddenly Foxy trips over herself to talk context.

This apparently is what's called even-handed in Foxyland. It also amply explains why she misunderstands so much of what goes on around her.