The Forum > General Discussion > Murder In America
Murder In America
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Page 37
- 38
- 39
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
"if half of what the shooters proposed was a good idea why didn’t someone propose it as a new motion and vote it in."
Speaking with a Greens MLC at the time, the concern was the proposed Shooters legislation was in two parts but presented as one, (A) Criminal Gun Crime and (B) Relaxation of Gun Licencing laws. Part (B) was unacceptable to many not just in the Greens, I think it was David Shoebridge, now Senator Shoebridge, who led the fight against it, but many in both the Liberal and Labor parties also had great concerns about relaxation. Many MP's seen part (A) as unnecessary, as existing laws covered that area aqdicuitly. It was put to the Shooters, if they were willing to separate their proposal into two, or rework it, then part (A) would have a reasonable chance of success, part (B) was doomed. The shooter refused to amend or withdraw, and their crappy legislation was defeated, not just by the Greens, but by Liberal and Labor as well.
It was suspected from the start that the proposal was nothing more than a stunt, and the Shooters knew it was doomed to failure, but it served a political purpose; ie Shooters could forevermore bost that "Greens are soft on criminals", Shooters are "soft on gun control".