What about that reprobate of an acting PM, Bonking Barney, who has solid form himself, claims Porter has been nothing more than a larrikin, and after a short spell in the naughty boys corner should be brought back in all his glory.

ttbn, all opinions matter, as does yours.

I actually like reading your views, as I do like reading Paul, CM and most others.

I think most of us have some merit within our views, but unfortunately in a complex world we end up gravitating to certain biases as imperfect policy choices have to be made. Hence, the many disagreements.

I do miss Joe Loudmouth's comments.

Pauliar,

Sarah Hansen Young's defamation suit was funded by a slush fund in which many donors remained anonymous by giving fictitious names

shonkysinister,

Making up lies again, got evidence

BTW, Sarah Hansen Young won her case, not like your grubby little TURD!

Pauliar,

Considering that you lie continuously:

Your grubby little turd might have won her case, but the question is what favours will she have to do for her anonymous donors?

"Hanson-Young’s entry shows the senator has allowed a handful of financial backers to hide their identities behind obviously fake names such as “Phoenix The whippet girl” and “Poopy Head”.

Some of the names that appear on Hanson-Young’s register of financial backers are either blatantly fake or too obscure to provide any guide as to the donors’ true identities.

They include: A Non, John51884010, Mary W, Anna B, Buzz Rainbow wolf, Geoff CB, Anne5597418226387985, Xander B, M G, stef stef, Dave C, Bin H, Nikki, E T and Leanne W.

For the senator to view this as somehow superior to Porter’s blind trust is ludicrous."