Dear Bazz,

Here's two links for you:

http://www.australiancoralreefsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/Ridd-questionable-claims-statement.pdf

And -

http://www.desmog.com/peter-ridd/

The status of the GBR is not as dire as many of QU's doomsday "experts" have predicted. As Peter Ridd showed, much of the research is fudged to give politically expedient results.

Shadow Minister,

Read the links I've cited as to who is doing the fudging
and why.

Lack of integrity always has been & always will be a trait of Academia !

Foxy,

As noted by the trial judge, at no time in any of the QU hearings or at the trial did anyone assert that Ridd's claims were incorrect. The action against Ridd was entirely based on his speaking out on the issues he found.

Shadow Minister,

Stop saying nonsense. His trial was about his
his breaking the university's code of conduct.
About his behaviour. Not his science. His science
has been vastly criticised as being flawed by
coral reef scientists and if you had bothered to
read the links I cited you would know why.