Foxy,

Pascoe has been completely discredited when two researchers painstakingly pointed out his deliberate misrepresentations of the evidence. So far NO ONE has done the same for Ridd.

All you have offered is polemics to rubbish his name and not one jot of actual counter-evidence. All we have from you is unprincipled hypocrisy.

Shadow Minister,

Give it a rest.

cont'd ...

Ridd has been totally discredited by coral reef scientists
and marine biologists. The two links I've cited clearly
demonstrate where his loyalties lie. As scientists have
pointed out the man cherry picks and massages the evidence
to fit his extremist views also his funding and support
comes from the fossil fuel and cane grower money and from
climate change denialist groups like the IPA, the Cato
Institute, the AEF, the Galileo movement - all of whom
give credence to his views.

The Murdoch media and right-wing shock jocks support him.

Yet you keep on ranting that nothing of substance has
been done to discredit the man? Okkaay. The only conclusion
we can come to is that your views are equally as blinkered
and flawed as his. And as I said - give it a rest.
You have no credibility whatsoever!

Ridd has been totally discredited by coral reef scientists
and marine biologists.
Foxy,
No-one's ever totally right whenever assumptions are made. It simply appears that Ridd was more right & paid for it. From my own experiences I am more inclined to believe him rather than the multitudes of Academic Experts' who have their snouts in the public trough & who don't want to miss out on the next feeding session !
Ridd & indeed all those with some integrity are seen as foes by the experts. I have actually gotten nervous nods of agreement whilst mentioning this to a Uni Chancellor some time ago.

individual,

Even people who are bought and paid for by the fossil fuel
and cane grower money?

Give it up fellers. Foxy has now proven she is not interested in true evidence, when it will destroy her argument.

She is now twisting & turning to come up with an answer to avoid looking at that evidence, so she can maintain her attitude

It is a sorry sight, but one I guess common to all left/green who know their argument is false, but don't want to face the fact.