The Forum > General Discussion > Bruce Pascoe’s ‘Dark Emu’’ debunked
Bruce Pascoe’s ‘Dark Emu’’ debunked
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Page 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Your remind me of the cat, once cornered, throwing out a limp pow in defence from the raging Rottweiler standing menacingly over the poor mange animal. You being the cat, I being the Rottweiler.
Ha, ha, my best political friend is a Muslim female senator, no tokenism there.
The mob from the extreme right, you included, the other want-a-be far right posters as well, add in Bolt and co, Mundine looks like he's trying to get in there for a pat on the head. You lot would have some credibility if only you could honestly say you have actual read 'DARK EMU'. You're passing judgement from a point of ignorance, not having read anything, other than cometary from biased sources, and simply regurgitating those opinions.
I read 'Dark Emu' it didn't change my opinion that pre colonisation Aboriginal people were predominantly hunter/gathers. What it did do was offer evidence, you and others if you ever read the book can dispute that evidence, that Aboriginal people had another string to their bow in the form of agriculture.
When I have read Sutton and Walshe I'll be in a position to give an opinion on their work. But till then, unlike you, I'm not going to speak from a position of ignorance.