The Forum > General Discussion > Bruce Pascoe’s ‘Dark Emu’’ debunked
Bruce Pascoe’s ‘Dark Emu’’ debunked
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 31
- 32
- 33
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The academics in question are anthropologist Peter Sutton and archaeologist, Keryn Walshe.
They accuse Pascoe of: "of a “lack of true scholarship”, ignoring Aboriginal voices, dragging respect for traditional Aboriginal culture back into the Eurocentric world of the colonial era, and “trimming” colonial observations to fit his argument. They write that while Dark Emu “purports to be factual” it is “littered with unsourced material, is poorly researched, distorts and exaggerates many points, selectively emphasises evidence to suit those opinions, and ignores large bodies of information that do not support the author’s opinions”.
"Pure fiction", they say.