The Forum > General Discussion > Bruce Pascoe’s ‘Dark Emu’’ debunked
Bruce Pascoe’s ‘Dark Emu’’ debunked
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Page 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- ...
- 31
- 32
- 33
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
“A village is a small settlement usually found in a rural setting. It is generally larger than a "hamlet" but smaller than a "town". Some geographers specifically define a village as having between 500 and 2,500 inhabitants.”
http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/village/
So here we have a first hand account of "seventy huts", each capable of housing "twelve to fifteen men" each, described as a "village" and of being a "permanent habitation", yet you and others will fight tooth and nail to discredit it, or to ignore it, or to say on this occasion Sturt was in error, or some such guff.
Where is the debunking you speak of?