Dear mhaze,

Rubbish mate. Trump only acted on the Skripal poisonings because of pressure from Congress. Even then it was a slight rap over the knuckles prohibiting American Banks from “participating in the primary market for non-rouble denominated bonds” issued by Russia.

What he should have targeted was the rouble dominated OFZ bonds which would have had a bit of bite. He didn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OFZ_(bond)

I picked the top of your list to dissect. I could do just as comprehensive a debunk on any of the others, you pick the next one and I will do so.

Dear Canem Malum,

Sure mate. Have you been reading any of his stuff?

“Post proof that the 7 billion people of humankind appointed YOU, of all people, to be their savious and redeemer BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. But it's too late! Because DE SKAH IS A-FAWLINl! DE SKAH IS A-FAWLINl! remember? All thos record cold events caused by global warming hahahahahaha!”

A few kangaroos loose in the top paddock me thinks but you might be a little more forgiving than I, or think this is normal discourse.

SR,

I said Trump has imposed more sanctions against Russia. Now as much as you want to muddy the water and try to ignore the point, it remains a fact (remember those?) that there are more US sanctions against Russia now than there were when Trump took over.

Now you might whine that he should have done more but that wasn't my point, or anyone's point really. If Plantagenet is right that Putin owns Trump, then there'd be less sanctions or no new sanctions. Is this get too complex for you?

Remember when SR used to complain that Obama should have been tougher on Putin? Me either.

SR

BLM is a self-avowed Marxist organisation, and hence opposed to the existence of private productive property, and in favour of the abolition of the family.

They also support critical race theory, which holds that people have rights based on their race, and they support compulsory indoctrination of children on that basis, as well as the re-introduction of official racial segregation, and racial differentials in taxation.

Your pretension to separate out BLM from its violent methods is entirely false, because they themselves don't agree with the distinction you are making, and neither do the Democrats, into whose treasury all BLM donations go. Kamala Harris has explicitly called for ongoing non-stop violence if Trump wins. And you support that, right?

BLM also don't agree that the Constitution is valid, because it's "racist" - what else? So you're against constitutional government, right?

Or you don't know what you're talking about?

Which?

So you are either
a) brainwashed into being a useful idiot but don't understand what you're talking about, OR
b)you support political violence, the attacking of political opponents on grounds of race and political opinion, racial discrimination and racial segregation, violent resistance to constitutional government, and arbitrary government power without limit or reason.

Which?

Hasbeen,

Well said. Only an idiot would say that Donald Trump encourages violence. BLM and others certainly do not need encouragement to violence; it's what they are all about.

Of course, nobody expects anything but idiocy from these Trumpophobes, who are all saying the same things they said before the 2016 election.

Dear Cumberland,

You wrote;

“BLM is a self-avowed Marxist organisation, and hence opposed to the existence of private productive property, and in favour of the abolition of the family.”

Bloody hell mate, you can't even tell the difference between a movement and an organisation so how on earth can you expect anyone to ever imagine they could have an intelligent conversation with you?

How old are you anyway? I suspect a teenager with the language you are using. Well there is a big world out there, perhaps you could go and broaden your perspective a little.

Dear mhaze,

Just for giggles I went and looked at a list of so called Russian Sanctions and it was mainly directed at individuals and companies but only 2 impacted Russia itself.

Is this what you mean by "more sanctions"? Keeping in mind the more substantial ones were Congress led not Trump instigated.

Dec 20, 2017 2 Russian individuals sanctioned.

Jan 26, 2018 5 Russian individuals and three Russian companies

May 15th 2018 5 Russian entities and 19 individuals were sanctioned for conducting a series of cyberattacks and interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections.

Apr 6 2018 7 Russian oligarchs and the companies they own or control, 17 senior Russian government officials, and a state-owned Russian weapons trading company (and a bank it owns) were sanctioned for their roles in advancing Russia’s malign activities – including the continued occupation of Crimea, engaging in cyberattacks, and supporting Assad’s regime.

Jun 11 2018 5 Russian entities and 3 individuals

Aug 8 2018 In response to Salisbury attack The U.S. administration announced it would restrict remaining sources of foreign assistance and arms sales to Russia, and deny U.S. credit to Russia, including through the Export-Import Bank. Restrictions would also prohibit the export of security-sensitive goods and technology.

Aug 21 2018 2 Russian individuals, and a Russian company

September 20 33 Russian individuals and entities were sanctioned for their role in U.S. election interference.

Dec 19 2018 18 Russian individuals were sanctioned for their involvement in a wide range of malign activities, including attempting to interfere in the 2016 U.S. Election.

March 11 2019 1 entity - Evrofinance Mosnarbank, a Moscow-based bank.

March 15 2019 6 Russian individuals and 8 entities

March 16 2019 A Chechen group and 5 Russian individuals

All this while Russia was revealed to have put bounties on the heads of US soldiers.

Oh and those sanctions for electoral interference, was the interference to get Trump elected or not?