The Forum > General Discussion > The Asianization of Australia?
The Asianization of Australia?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
- All
Posted by individual, Saturday, 31 October 2020 11:03:05 AM
| |
Good Morning Is Mise,
Now to get back in answer to your question of "How should Australia defend itself against China?". I'm no expert but it appears that our government is taking certain precautions that many of us may not be aware of. Paul Dibb, Professor of Strategic Studies at the ANU tells us in an article he wrote in March of this year that - "Two important military developments recently should give China pause for thought. The first is the announcement by Prime Minister Scott Morrison of a $1.1 billion upgrade to the Royal Australian Air Force Base at Tindal which is about 300 kilometres south of Darwin, to lengthen the runway - so that US B-52 strategic bombers as well as our own KC-30 air-to-air refuelling aircraft can operate from there." "The second development is the announcement by the US State Dept that Australia has been cleared at a cost of about $1.4 billion to purchase 200 AGM - 158C long-range anti- ship missiles (LRASM) which can be fired from our F/A - 18 super hornets and the F-35s when they are delivered". Paul Dibb sums up that "Taken together, then, the upgrade of Tindal and the acquisition of LRASMs reiforce the US alliance and foreshadow a significantly more potent Australian deterrent capability to assert control over our own region of primary strategic concern". "The significance of these 2 developments occurring at the same time should not be underestimated and certainly not in Beijing". There's more at the following link: http://www.nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-australia-can-defend-itself-against-china-military-132677 _________________________________________________________________ Hi Armchair Critic, Thank you for your concern. British English has tended to keep the spelling of words it has absorbed from other languages (e.g. French) while American English has adapted the spelling to reflect the way the words actually sound. As I am writing for a mixed group on this forum I prefer to use the American "iza" instead of the British "isa". It's my personal choice and I appreciate your tolerance of it. (smile). Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 31 October 2020 11:03:24 AM
| |
cont'd ...
Is Mise, Sorry for the typo. Here's the link again: http://www.nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-australia-can-defend-itself-against-chinas-military-132677 Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 31 October 2020 11:07:47 AM
| |
And right on cue our resident nasty, ttbn, rears his head.
He can't resist. I get quite excited when I see his name on any of my discussions thinking - maybe, just maybe, we're going to get something of substance from him, but sadly - no. I guess his hatred of me is too deeply ingrained over which I have no control. If I was to walk on water - he's say - "See - she can't swim!" No matter what subject I raise as a discussion - it's always according to him, "stupid". And I always have a "hidden" agenda. He's under no obligation to contribute to any of my discussions - but he simply can't resist coming on with his attempted put-downs. He reminds me of those poor demented creatures you see standing on street corners and yelling at people Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 31 October 2020 11:49:04 AM
| |
ttbn,
The Americans use English English we, on the other hand, tend to follow British English which is laced with French or French-influenced spellings. Thus: program/programme. center/centre labor/labour and so on. (fortunately, we've gotten rid of the 'u' from 'doctour'. Even the American military salute is English, unlike the British salute which is German, although the British Navy and ours, still use the English salute. The USA is a repository of British spellings and customs and the nearest to spoken Elizabethan/Shakespear's English is said to be the dialects spoken by the so-called "Hillbillies". Posted by Is Mise, Saturday, 31 October 2020 4:20:59 PM
| |
Is Mise,
Thankyou for your info. You have told me this before, and I respect your take on on the matter. There are more important things than spelling, and I might have a rigid attitude, but I still prefer the the way I was taught, and I will always prefer it. I'm far from anti-American, but Australians have allowed themselves to take on too many Americanisms. Part of their cultural cringe and feelings of inadequacy, silly and all that those feelings are. My country, my culture is the one I like and admire. I don't intend to take on alien culture or language, and I don't expect other countries and cultures to change their ways either. Posted by ttbn, Saturday, 31 October 2020 4:55:39 PM
|
Paul1405,
Yes, because these were migrants looking for a new life, not a hand-out existense !
...you put yourself forward as an AMERICAN! What's the go with that?
I did ??