Above post is my opinion.

For cases involving a young adult and a minor where vaginal intercourse took place, a judge has discretion whether to place the person convicted of statutory rape on the sex offender registry.

The judge does not have any discretion when the case involves anal or oral sex.

SB 145 would eliminate automatic sex offender registration for young adults who have anal or oral sex with a minor. Instead, a judge would make the decision, just as they do now in cases involving vaginal intercourse.

SB 145 would apply only to cases involving minors between the ages of 14-17, and an offender within a 10-year range.

J osephus,

Sorry, my English is only ordinary, I don't understand some of what you are writing. In fact, I'm still in the dark over what you're complaining about.

I think I get it: it would be still illegal in California for sexual relations between people, one at least of whom is not old enough to care for a family ? Around sixteen or seventeen ? Is that it ?

Joe

TRUMP DOUBLY CONFESSES!

Following Trump's well-earned Downfall http://youtu.be/71MPsqS7tCk

Trump has admitted he's So Sorry, for many things, in these abject tones http://youtu.be/0BcPZR6lDlM

Trump has given himself up for permanent imprisonment at Gitmo.

Hi Joe(lm2)

Agent "Josephus" from ARIZONA's main objective for "writing" and "complaining about" this

California legislation is to try and connect it with Kamala Harris, a Senator for California.

This is another veiled piece of propaganda/fake news in the Campaign to make Trump Great Again.