The Forum > General Discussion > What if its all for nothing
What if its all for nothing
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 49
- 50
- 51
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
SKorea and Taiwan are interesting in that they know China better than most and were therefore not sucked in by the original lies perpetrated by the China Communist Party. Taiwan had the added advantage of not being a member of WHO and therefore avoiding all the utter misinformation put out but that walking advertisement for the closure of all UN agencies.
So closing down society wasn't necessarily required. But we had untested models telling medical bureaucrats and thereafter politicians that the sky was about to fall. That those models were working on faulty early data is now pretty clear. Even the very best of forecasting models are subject to GIGO - garbage in leads to garbage out.
It seems obvious that there is an element in the US decision making structure who want to bring the economy out of mothballs earlier rather than later. But there seems to be no such constituency here. Closing the economy for six months will do unimaginable damage for at least a generation.
Each month 100 Australians die in road accidents. To date the Wuhan Virus has killed about 15 per month. Maybe thousands would have died had we not taken these panic measures. But the growing evidences suggest not.
Is the destruction of the economy worth it?