The Forum > General Discussion > It ain't gonna rain no more!
It ain't gonna rain no more!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Page 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
-
- All
Posted by mhaze, Tuesday, 18 February 2020 3:00:49 PM
| |
HASBEEN,
you're really really starting to bore the hell out of me. The Garnaut report predicted 2019 spot on, discussing STATISTICALLY drier, hotter weather for longer periods, but not predicting WHEN that weather would fall across 2019. Statistics are climate. Exactly when something happens is weather. Again, look up: Keywords for climate Deniers to read in the dictionary: WEATHER, CLIMATE, RECORD AS IN ‘RECORD DROUGHT 2019’, and of course MYOPIC as in ‘He was myopic and thought his Shire portrayed the world.’ You REALLY NEED to know what the difference between climate and weather! Lately I've been wincing every time you post. I try not to look! But to try and break down a long subject into shorter soundbytes:- climate change increases BOTH droughts and floods as:- 1. It makes some weather systems move 2. Warmer air can get 'wetter', moving more water vapour from where it is drying (drought) to increase dumping deluges somewhere else (flooding). Famine and flood both increase. http://climate.nasa.gov/news/2881/earths-freshwater-future-extremes-of-flood-and-drought/ Posted by Max Green, Tuesday, 18 February 2020 3:35:30 PM
| |
Mhaze,
maybe if you had thought more about what the following formula actually meant, you would have held your tongue and shut your mouth and held in your Dunning Krugers. "Nuclear + EV's = ZERO emission energy sector" IS TRUE in that everything done from that moment on is emissions free. Every new nuke and car and tree cut and table transported is emissions free, at least as far as the energy it took to do those things. (I'm not discussing semantic games like land use CO2 changes or other things when we cut down trees, as you'll probably want to debate like a little pissant totally missing the main point - I'm talking about the ENERGY used to do these things.) But instead of accept the truth that fissioning forward doesn't produce CO2, you want to quibble over the past energy it took to build the nuke, even when that's only 12 g / kwh. It's not my fault you embarrassed yourself by lying and stating it was 11 times worse! Whatever. You're a pissant, and can't be trusted - especially when you're all pissy and got your knickers in a knot. Posted by Max Green, Tuesday, 18 February 2020 3:47:36 PM
| |
Hot is cold, wet is dry, these people trying to justify their ill begotten income from the global warming scam expect us to believe the idiotic. Max you are a fraud just like CO2 caused global warming scam.
You & SR trying to pretend the BOM no rain until may didn't happen, even after it was all over TV radio & print highlighted your desire to make fraudulent statements so much that you make fools of yourselves, if you think you can get away with it. Sorry mate, back to conman 101 for you. Posted by Hasbeen, Tuesday, 18 February 2020 4:10:25 PM
| |
" You're a pissant, and can't be trusted - especially when you're all pissy and got your knickers in a knot."
From the great Christopher Hitchens..."I always think its a sign of victory when they move on to the ad hominem". I'll accept the victory and move on. Posted by mhaze, Tuesday, 18 February 2020 6:21:50 PM
| |
These weather people belong at the Mad Hatters ball.
C'mon seriously no rain till May? Seriously I don't know what happens where you people live in Australia; - But where I live, at the end of summer every single year we get a decent downpour over 2 or 3 days that marks the end of summer. Every year, without fail. Posted by Armchair Critic, Tuesday, 18 February 2020 6:27:16 PM
|
It started with you asserting (evidence free) that "Nuclear + EV's = ZERO emission energy sector"
I then pointed out "Nuclear isn't emission free".
You then complained I haven't offered any "scientific paper justifying why?"
NOW you're asserting that indeed nuclear isn't emission free and proclaiming that " It only took 2 days, but you got there!"
Dear oh dear Max. Is it that you just hope that I won't point out your cant or do you really struggle to follow the flow of a thread.
Of course its all a storm in a teacup. I don't oppose nuclear or solar or gerbils on treadmills or whatever. I just oppose boosters who are happy to simply distort the facts in support of their favoured form of energy production.
On a side note...which country led the world in reducing emissions from energy production last year? Research it...but if the research doesn't result in the answer being Trump's USA, you did it wrong.